Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy

dc.bibliographicCitation.date2015
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage24
dc.bibliographicCitation.issueA
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleTechnological forecasting and social change : an international journaleng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage44
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume90
dc.contributor.authorKriegler, Elmar
dc.contributor.authorRiahi, Keywan
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Nico
dc.contributor.authorSchwanitz, Valeria Jana
dc.contributor.authorPetermann, Nils
dc.contributor.authorBosetti, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorMarcucci, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorOtto, Sander
dc.contributor.authorParoussos, Leonidas
dc.contributor.authorRao, Shilpa
dc.contributor.authorCurrás, Tabaré Arroyo
dc.contributor.authorAshina, Shuichi
dc.contributor.authorBollen, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorEom, Jiyong
dc.contributor.authorHamdi-Cherif, Meriem
dc.contributor.authorLongden, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKitous, Alban
dc.contributor.authorMéjean, Aurélie
dc.contributor.authorSano, Fuminori
dc.contributor.authorSchaeffer, Michiel
dc.contributor.authorWada, Kenichi
dc.contributor.authorCapros, Pantelis
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, Detlef P.
dc.contributor.authorEdenhofer, Ottmar
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis study explores a situation of staged accession to a global climate policy regime from the current situation of regionally fragmented and moderate climate action. The analysis is based on scenarios in which a front runner coalition – the EU or the EU and China – embarks on immediate ambitious climate action while the rest of the world makes a transition to a global climate regime between 2030 and 2050. We assume that the ensuing regime involves strong mitigation efforts but does not require late joiners to compensate for their initially higher emissions. Thus, climate targets are relaxed, and although staged accession can achieve significant reductions of global warming, the resulting climate outcome is unlikely to be consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees. The addition of China to the front runner coalition can reduce pre-2050 excess emissions by 20–30%, increasing the likelihood of staying below 2 degrees. Not accounting for potential co-benefits, the cost of front runner action is found to be lower for the EU than for China. Regions that delay their accession to the climate regime face a trade-off between reduced short term costs and higher transitional requirements due to larger carbon lock-ins and more rapidly increasing carbon prices during the accession period.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9783
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/8821
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021
dc.relation.essn0040-1625
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc600
dc.subject.otherCarbon leakageeng
dc.subject.otherClimate change economicseng
dc.subject.otherClimate change mitigationeng
dc.subject.otherEuropean Unioneng
dc.subject.otherIntegrated assessment modelseng
dc.subject.otherRegional climate policieseng
dc.titleMaking or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policyeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKger
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Making_or_breaking_climate_targets.pdf
Size:
913.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: