Intercomparison and characterization of 23 Aethalometers under laboratory and ambient air conditions: procedures and unit-to-unit variabilities

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage3195eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage3216eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume14eng
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Mosquera, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMočnik, Griša
dc.contributor.authorDrinovec, Luka
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorPfeifer, Sascha
dc.contributor.authorMinguillón, María Cruz
dc.contributor.authorBriel, Björn
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDudoitis, Vadimas
dc.contributor.authorFernández-García, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Amado, María
dc.contributor.authorFerreira De Brito, Joel
dc.contributor.authorRiffault, Veronique
dc.contributor.authorFlentje, Harald
dc.contributor.authorHeffernan, Eimear
dc.contributor.authorKalivitis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorKalogridis, Athina-Cerise
dc.contributor.authorKeernik, Hannes
dc.contributor.authorMarmureanu, Luminita
dc.contributor.authorLuoma, Krista
dc.contributor.authorMarinoni, Angela
dc.contributor.authorPikridas, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSchauer, Gerhard
dc.contributor.authorSerfozo, Norbert
dc.contributor.authorServomaa, Henri
dc.contributor.authorTitos, Gloria
dc.contributor.authorYus-Díez, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorZioła, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorWiedensohler, Alfred
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T14:02:37Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T14:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAerosolized black carbon is monitored worldwide to quantify its impact on air quality and climate. Given its importance, measurements of black carbon mass concentrations must be conducted with instruments operating in qualitychecked and ensured conditions to generate data which are reliable and comparable temporally and geographically. In this study, we report the results from the largest characterization and intercomparison of filter-based absorption photometers, the Aethalometer model AE33, belonging to several European monitoring networks. Under controlled laboratory conditions, a total of 23 instruments measured mass concentrations of black carbon from three wellcharacterized aerosol sources: synthetic soot, nigrosin particles, and ambient air from the urban background of Leipzig, Germany. The objective was to investigate the individual performance of the instruments and their comparability; we analyzed the response of the instruments to the different aerosol sources and the impact caused by the use of obsolete filter materials and the application of maintenance activities. Differences in the instrument-to-instrument variabilities from equivalent black carbon (eBC) concentrations reported at 880 nm were determined before maintenance activities (for soot measurements, average deviation from total least square regression was-2.0% and the range-16% to 7 %; for nigrosin measurements, average deviation was 0.4% and the range-15% to 17 %), and after they were carried out (for soot measurements, average deviation was-1.0% and the range-14% to 8 %; for nigrosin measurements, the average deviation was 0.5%and the range-12%to 15 %). The deviations are in most of the cases explained by the type of filter material employed by the instruments, the total particle load on the filter, and the flow calibration. The results of this intercomparison activity show that relatively small unit-to-unit variability of AE33-based particle light absorbing measurements is possible with wellmaintained instruments. It is crucial to follow the guidelines for maintenance activities and the use of the proper filter tape in the AE33 to ensure high quality and comparable black carbon (BC) measurements among international observational networks. © 2021 Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8239
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7277
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : European Geosciences Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3195-2021
dc.relation.essn1867-8548
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric Measurement Techniques 14 (2021), Nr. 4eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectambient aireng
dc.subjectcomparative studyeng
dc.subjectequipmenteng
dc.subjectlaboratory methodeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleIntercomparison and characterization of 23 Aethalometers under laboratory and ambient air conditions: procedures and unit-to-unit variabilitieseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric Measurement Techniqueseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
amt-14-3195-2021.pdf
Size:
5.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: