Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage3179
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleClinical oral investigations : Organ of: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkundeeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage3187
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume26
dc.contributor.authorKamionka, Julia
dc.contributor.authorMatthes, Rutger
dc.contributor.authorHoltfreter, Birte
dc.contributor.authorPink, Christiane
dc.contributor.authorSchlüter, Rabea
dc.contributor.authorvon Woedtke, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKocher, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorJablonowski, Lukasz
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T05:08:43Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T05:08:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface. Materials and methods: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses. Results: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP. Conclusions: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces. Clinical relevance. Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11699
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10732
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBerlin ; Heidelberg : Springer
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0
dc.relation.essn1436-3771
dc.relation.issn1432-6981
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.subject.otherBiofilmeng
dc.subject.otherCold atmospheric plasmaeng
dc.subject.otherDental implanteng
dc.subject.otherPowdereng
dc.subject.otherSurface treatmenteng
dc.titleEfficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaceseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorINP
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheitger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Efficiency_of_cold_atmospheric_plasma.pdf
Size:
1.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections