S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee00567eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10eng
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Judah
dc.contributor.authorCoumou, Dim
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorMackey, Lester
dc.contributor.authorOrenstein, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorTotz, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorTziperman, Eli
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T08:40:40Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T08:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state-of-the-art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real-time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid-winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid-latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10248
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9284
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMalden, MA : Wiley-Blackwelleng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
dc.relation.essn1757-7799
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change 10 (2019), Nr. 2eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectclimate predictioneng
dc.subjectmachine learningeng
dc.subjectpolar vortexeng
dc.subjectunsupervised learningeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleS2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecastseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleWIREs Climate Changeeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
S2S-reboot.pdf
Size:
2.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: