Inversion-recovery MR elastography of the human brain for improved stiffness quantification near fluid-solid boundaries

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage2552eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleMagnetic resonance in medicine : MRMeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage2561eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume86eng
dc.contributor.authorLilaj, Ledia
dc.contributor.authorHerthum, Helge
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Tom
dc.contributor.authorShahryari, Mehrgan
dc.contributor.authorBertalan, Gergely
dc.contributor.authorCaiazzo, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorSack, Ingolf
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T06:06:32Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T06:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In vivo MR elastography (MRE) holds promise as a neuroimaging marker. In cerebral MRE, shear waves are introduced into the brain, which also stimulate vibrations in adjacent CSF, resulting in blurring and biased stiffness values near brain surfaces. We here propose inversion-recovery MRE (IR-MRE) to suppress CSF signal and improve stiffness quantification in brain surface areas. Methods: Inversion-recovery MRE was demonstrated in agar-based phantoms with solid-fluid interfaces and 11 healthy volunteers using 31.25-Hz harmonic vibrations. It was performed by standard single-shot, spin-echo EPI MRE following 2800-ms IR preparation. Wave fields were acquired in 10 axial slices and analyzed for shear wave speed (SWS) as a surrogate marker of tissue stiffness by wavenumber-based multicomponent inversion. Results: Phantom SWS values near fluid interfaces were 7.5 ± 3.0% higher in IR-MRE than MRE (P =.01). In the brain, IR-MRE SNR was 17% lower than in MRE, without influencing parenchymal SWS (MRE: 1.38 ± 0.02 m/s; IR-MRE: 1.39 ± 0.03 m/s; P =.18). The IR-MRE tissue–CSF interfaces appeared sharper, showing 10% higher SWS near brain surfaces (MRE: 1.01 ± 0.03 m/s; IR-MRE: 1.11 ± 0.01 m/s; P <.001) and 39% smaller ventricle sizes than MRE (P <.001). Conclusions: Our results show that brain MRE is affected by fluid oscillations that can be suppressed by IR-MRE, which improves the depiction of anatomy in stiffness maps and the quantification of stiffness values in brain surface areas. Moreover, we measured similar stiffness values in brain parenchyma with and without fluid suppression, which indicates that shear wavelengths in solid and fluid compartments are identical, consistent with the theory of biphasic poroelastic media. © 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicineeng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8399
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7437
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherNew York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley-Lisseng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28898
dc.relation.essn1522-2594
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.subject.otherbrain surface areaseng
dc.subject.othercerebral cortexeng
dc.subject.otherinversion-recovery MREeng
dc.subject.otherporoelastographyeng
dc.subject.otherstiffnesseng
dc.subject.otherventricleseng
dc.titleInversion-recovery MR elastography of the human brain for improved stiffness quantification near fluid-solid boundarieseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorWIASeng
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheiteng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Inversion-recovery_MR_elastography.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections