Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee70462eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume8eng
dc.contributor.authorMatthes, R.
dc.contributor.authorBender, C.
dc.contributor.authorSchlüter, R.
dc.contributor.authorKoban, I.
dc.contributor.authorBussiahn, R.
dc.contributor.authorReuter, S.
dc.contributor.authorLademann, J.
dc.contributor.authorWeltmann, K.-D.
dc.contributor.authorKramer, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T17:21:11Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T17:21:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThe treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their efficacy against microbial biofilms with chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) as representative of an important antibiofilm antiseptic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 and Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were cultivated on polycarbonate discs. The biofilms were treated for 30, 60, 150, 300 or 600 s with plasma or for 600 s with 0.1% CHX, respectively. After treatment, biofilms were dispensed by ultrasound and the antimicrobial effects were determined as difference in the number of the colony forming units by microbial culture. A high antimicrobial efficacy on biofilms of both plasma sources in comparison to CHX treatment was shown. The efficacy differs between the used strains and plasma sources. For illustration, the biofilms were examined under a scanning electron microscope before and after treatment. Additionally, cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay with L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The cell toxicity of the used plasma limits its applicability on human tissue to maximally 150 s. The emitted UV irradiance was measured to estimate whether UV could limit the application on human tissue at the given parameters. It was found that the UV emission is negligibly low. In conclusion, the results support the assumption that air plasma could be an option for therapy of chronic wounds.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/4603
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/5974
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSan Francisco, CA : Public Library of Scienceeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE 8 (2013), Nr. 7eng
dc.relation.issn1932-6203
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject3 (4,5 dimethyl 2 thiazolyl) 2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromideeng
dc.subjectchlorhexidine gluconateeng
dc.subjectanimal celleng
dc.subjectantibacterial activityeng
dc.subjectarticleeng
dc.subjectbacterium cultureeng
dc.subjectbiofilmeng
dc.subjectcell assayeng
dc.subjectcell viabilityeng
dc.subjectcolony forming uniteng
dc.subjectcomparative studyeng
dc.subjectcontrolled studyeng
dc.subjectcytotoxicityeng
dc.subjectfibroblasteng
dc.subjecthumaneng
dc.subjecthuman tissueeng
dc.subjectin vitro studyeng
dc.subjectmedical deviceeng
dc.subjectmouseeng
dc.subjectnonhumaneng
dc.subjectPseudomonas aeruginosaeng
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopeeng
dc.subjectsensitivity analysiseng
dc.subjectStaphylococcus epidermidiseng
dc.subjectstructured electrode planar surface dielectric barrier dischargeeng
dc.subjectultraviolet radiationeng
dc.subjectwire electrode surface dielectric barrier dischargeeng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.titleAntimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilmseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePLoS ONEeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINPeng
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheiteng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Matthes2013.pdf
Size:
1.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections