Comparison of Photocatalytic Membrane Reactor Types for the Degradation of an Organic Molecule by TiO2-Coated PES Membrane

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage725eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleCatalystseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10eng
dc.contributor.authorRegmi, Chhabilal
dc.contributor.authorLotfi, Shabnam
dc.contributor.authorEspíndola, Jonathan Cawettiere
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Agnes
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Andrea Iris
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-13T05:23:22Z
dc.date.available2021-09-13T05:23:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPhotocatalytic membrane reactors with different configurations (design, flow modes and light sources) have been widely applied for pollutant removal. A thorough understanding of the contribution of reactor design to performance is required to be able to compare photocatalytic materials. Reactors with different flow designs are implemented for process efficiency comparisons. Several figures-of-merit, namely adapted space-time yield (STY) and photocatalytic space-time yield (PSTY), specific energy consumption (SEC) and degradation rate constants, were used to assess the performance of batch, flow-along and flow-through reactors. A fair comparison of reactor performance, considering throughput together with energy efficiency and photocatalytic activity, was only possible with the modified PSTY. When comparing the three reactors at the example of methylene blue (MB) degradation under LED irradiation, flow-through proved to be the most efficient design. PSTY1/PSTY2 values were approximately 10 times higher than both the batch and flow-along processes. The highest activity of such a reactor is attributed to its unique flow design which allowed the reaction to take place not only on the outer surface of the membrane but also within its pores. The enhancement of the mass transfer when flowing in a narrow space (220 nm in flow-through) contributes to an additional MB removal. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6787
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5834
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : MDPIeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/catal10070725
dc.relation.essn2073-4344
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc540eng
dc.subject.otherMass transfereng
dc.subject.otherPhotocatalytic space-time yieldeng
dc.subject.otherReactor comparisoneng
dc.subject.otherResidence timeeng
dc.subject.otherSpace-time yieldeng
dc.subject.otherWater treatmenteng
dc.titleComparison of Photocatalytic Membrane Reactor Types for the Degradation of an Organic Molecule by TiO2-Coated PES Membraneeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIOMeng
wgl.subjectChemieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of photocatalytic membrane reactor types for the degradation of an organic molecule by TiO2-coated PES membrane.pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections