Proximal Soil Sensing - A Contribution for Species Habitat Distribution Modelling of Earthworms in Agricultural Soils?

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee0158271eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePLOS ONEeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume11eng
dc.contributor.authorSchirrmann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJoschko, Monika
dc.contributor.authorGebbers, Robin
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Eckart
dc.contributor.authorZörner, Mirjam
dc.contributor.authorBarkusky, Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorTimmer, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T06:56:49Z
dc.date.available2022-05-06T06:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: Earthworms are important for maintaining soil ecosystem functioning and serve as indicators of soil fertility. However, detection of earthworms is time-consuming, which hinders the assessment of earthworm abundances with high sampling density over entire fields. Recent developments of mobile terrestrial sensor platforms for proximal soil sensing (PSS) provided new tools for collecting dense spatial information of soils using various sensing principles. Yet, the potential of PSS for assessing earthworm habitats is largely unexplored. This study investigates whether PSS data contribute to the spatial prediction of earthworm abundances in species distribution models of agricultural soils. Methodology/Principal Findings: Proximal soil sensing data, e.g., soil electrical conductivity (EC), pH, and near infrared absorbance (NIR), were collected in real-time in a field with two management strategies (reduced tillage / conventional tillage) and sandy to loam soils. PSS was related to observations from a long-term (11 years) earthworm observation study conducted at 42 plots. Earthworms were sampled from 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.2 m³ soil blocks and identified to species level. Sensor data were highly correlated with earthworm abundances observed in reduced tillage but less correlated with earthworm abundances observed in conventional tillage. This may indicate that management influences the sensor-earthworm relationship. Generalized additive models and state-space models showed that modelling based on data fusion from EC, pH, and NIR sensors produced better results than modelling without sensor data or data from just a single sensor. Regarding the individual earthworm species, particular sensor combinations were more appropriate than others due to the different habitat requirements of the earthworms. Earthworm species with soil-specific habitat preferences were spatially predicted with higher accuracy by PSS than more ubiquitous species. Conclusions/Significance: Our findings suggest that PSS contributes to the spatial modelling of earthworm abundances at field scale and that it will support species distribution modelling in the attempt to understand the soil-earthworm relationships in agroecosystems.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8892
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7930
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSan Francisco, California, US : PLOSeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158271
dc.relation.essn1932-6203
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.subject.otherorganic mattereng
dc.subject.othercarboneng
dc.subject.othersoileng
dc.subject.othersoil pollutanteng
dc.subject.otheragricultural landeng
dc.subject.otherArticleeng
dc.subject.otherbulk densityeng
dc.subject.othercontrolled studyeng
dc.subject.othercorrelation analysiseng
dc.subject.otherearthwormeng
dc.subject.otherecosystemeng
dc.subject.otherelectric conductivityeng
dc.subject.otherelectrochemistryeng
dc.subject.otherenvironmental managementeng
dc.subject.otherenvironmental parameterseng
dc.subject.otherevolutionary adaptationeng
dc.subject.othergeographic information systemeng
dc.subject.otherindependent component analysiseng
dc.subject.otherlandscapeeng
dc.subject.otherloam soileng
dc.subject.othernear infrared absorbanceeng
dc.subject.othernonhumaneng
dc.subject.otherobservational studyeng
dc.subject.otherpHeng
dc.subject.otherphysical chemistryeng
dc.subject.otherpopulation abundanceeng
dc.subject.otherproximal soil sensingeng
dc.subject.othersandy soileng
dc.subject.othersoil analysiseng
dc.subject.othersoil moistureeng
dc.subject.othersoil propertyeng
dc.subject.otherspecies cultivationeng
dc.subject.otherspecies distributioneng
dc.subject.otherspecies habitateng
dc.subject.otheragricultureeng
dc.subject.otheranalysiseng
dc.subject.otheranimaleng
dc.subject.othergeographyeng
dc.subject.othernear infrared spectroscopyeng
dc.subject.otherOligochaetaeng
dc.subject.otherphysiologyeng
dc.subject.otherprocedureseng
dc.subject.othersoileng
dc.subject.othersoil pollutanteng
dc.subject.otherAgricultureeng
dc.subject.otherAnimalseng
dc.subject.otherCarboneng
dc.subject.otherEcosystemeng
dc.subject.otherGeographyeng
dc.subject.otherHydrogen-Ion Concentrationeng
dc.subject.otherOligochaetaeng
dc.subject.otherSoileng
dc.subject.otherSoil Pollutantseng
dc.subject.otherSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredeng
dc.titleProximal Soil Sensing - A Contribution for Species Habitat Distribution Modelling of Earthworms in Agricultural Soils?eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBeng
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheiteng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Proximal_Soil_Sensing-A_Contribution_for_Species_Habitat_Distribution.pdf
Size:
5.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections