When Density Functional Approximations Meet Iron Oxides

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage5132eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue10eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage5144eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume12eng
dc.contributor.authorMeng, Yu
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xing-Wu
dc.contributor.authorHuo, Chun-Fang
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Wen-Ping
dc.contributor.authorCao, Dong-Bo
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Qing
dc.contributor.authorDearden, Albert
dc.contributor.authorGonze, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yong
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jianguo
dc.contributor.authorJiao, Haijun
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yongwang
dc.contributor.authorWen, Xiao-Dong
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T07:48:19Z
dc.date.available2022-08-08T07:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThree density functional approximations (DFAs), PBE, PBE+U, and Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof screened hybrid functional (HSE), were employed to investigate the geometric, electronic, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties of four iron oxides, namely, α-FeOOH, α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and FeO. Comparing our calculated results with available experimental data, we found that HSE (a = 0.15) (containing 15% "screened" Hartree-Fock exchange) can provide reliable values of lattice constants, Fe magnetic moments, band gaps, and formation energies of all four iron oxides, while standard HSE (a = 0.25) seriously overestimates the band gaps and formation energies. For PBE+U, a suitable U value can give quite good results for the electronic properties of each iron oxide, but it is challenging to accurately get other properties of the four iron oxides using the same U value. Subsequently, we calculated the Gibbs free energies of transformation reactions among iron oxides using the HSE (a = 0.15) functional and plotted the equilibrium phase diagrams of the iron oxide system under various conditions, which provide reliable theoretical insight into the phase transformations of iron oxides.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9955
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/8993
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWashington, DC : Soc.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00640
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of chemical theory and computation : JCTC 12 (2016), Nr. 10eng
dc.relation.issn1549-9626
dc.rights.licenseACS AuthorChoiceeng
dc.rights.urihttps://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.htmleng
dc.subjectElectrical conductivityeng
dc.subjectEnergyeng
dc.subjectFree energyeng
dc.subjectOxideseng
dc.subjectPhase diagramseng
dc.subject.ddc540eng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.titleWhen Density Functional Approximations Meet Iron Oxideseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of chemical theory and computation : JCTCeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorLIKATeng
wgl.subjectChemieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
When_Density_Functional.pdf
Size:
3.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections