Geoarchaeological studies on Roman time harbour sediments in Cologne — comparison of different OSL dating techniques

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage341eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleGeochronometria : journal on methods and applications of absolute chronologyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage349eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume38eng
dc.contributor.authorLauer, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorBonn, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorFrechen, Manfred
dc.contributor.authorFuchs, Magret
dc.contributor.authorTrier, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorTsukamoto, Sumiko
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T07:04:06Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T07:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractDue to the construction of a new North-South subway in Cologne, Roman time harbour sediments were exposed and were sampled for luminescence dating. A very good independent age control was given by the precise knowledge of the chronology of Roman activity and by radiocarbon ages of charcoal samples. Hence, different methodological approaches within luminescence dating were applied for Holocene heterogeneously bleached fluvial samples and were compared to the known ages. For one sample, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating was applied to coarse-grained quartz using a single aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol. After De-measurements, dif-ferent statistical approaches were tested (i.e. arithmetic mean, median, minimum age model, finite mixture model, leading edge method and the Fuchs and Lang approach). It is demonstrated that the Fuchs and Lang approach along with the leading edge method yielded the best matching OSL ages with respect to the known ages. For the other sample which showed feldspar contamination within the quartz signal, the post-IR blue stimulated luminescence (double SAR protocol) was measured in three different ways to calculate the De-value: with continuous wave (CW) stimulation with an IR-bleach at 50°C and at 225°C for 100 s prior to the OSL, and pulsed OSL (POSL). It was demonstrated that the IR-stimulation at 225°C has very good potential to remove the feldspar signal contribution as well as pulsed OSL, but the former might deplete parts of the quartz OSL signal. © 2011 Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. All rights reserved.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8028
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7069
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWarsaw : De Gruytereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-011-0020-y
dc.relation.essn1897-1695
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc620eng
dc.subject.ddc690eng
dc.subject.otherFeldspar impuritieseng
dc.subject.otherGeoarchaeologyeng
dc.subject.otherOSLeng
dc.subject.otherRomanseng
dc.subject.otherStatistical modelseng
dc.titleGeoarchaeological studies on Roman time harbour sediments in Cologne — comparison of different OSL dating techniqueseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorLIAGeng
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.2478_s13386-011-0020-y.pdf
Size:
872.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: