EURODELTA III exercise: An evaluation of air quality models’ capacity to reproduce the carbonaceous aerosol

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage100018eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume2eng
dc.contributor.authorMircea, Mihaela
dc.contributor.authorBessagnet, Bertrand
dc.contributor.authorD'Isidoro, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorPirovano, Guido
dc.contributor.authorAksoyoglu, Sebnem
dc.contributor.authorCiarelli, Giancarlo
dc.contributor.authorTsyro, Svetlana
dc.contributor.authorManders, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorBieser, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorStern, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorVivanco, Marta García
dc.contributor.authorCuvelier, Cornelius
dc.contributor.authorAas, Wenche
dc.contributor.authorPrévôt, André S.H.
dc.contributor.authorAulinger, Armin
dc.contributor.authorBriganti, Gino
dc.contributor.authorCalori, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorCappelletti, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorColette, Augustin
dc.contributor.authorCouvidat, Florian
dc.contributor.authorFagerli, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorFinardi, Sandro
dc.contributor.authorKranenburg, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRouïl, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorSilibello, Camillo
dc.contributor.authorSpindler, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorPoulain, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Hartmut
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Jose L.
dc.contributor.authorDay, Douglas A.
dc.contributor.authorTiitta, Petri
dc.contributor.authorCarbone, Samara
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T05:37:17Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T05:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe carbonaceous aerosol accounts for an important part of total aerosol mass, affects human health and climate through its effects on physical and chemical properties of the aerosol, yet the understanding of its atmospheric sources and sinks is still incomplete. This study shows the state-of-the-art in modelling carbonaceous aerosol over Europe by comparing simulations performed with seven chemical transport models (CTMs) currently in air quality assessments in Europe: CAMx, CHIMERE, CMAQ, EMEP/MSC-W, LOTOS-EUROS, MINNI and RCGC. The simulations were carried out in the framework of the EURODELTA III modelling exercise and were evaluated against field measurements from intensive campaigns of European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and the European Integrated Project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality Interactions (EUCAARI). Model simulations were performed over the same domain, using as much as possible the same input data and covering four seasons: summer (1–30 June 2006), winter (8 January – 4 February 2007), autumn (17 September- 15 October 2008) and spring (25 February - 26 March 2009). The analyses of models’ performances in prediction of elemental carbon (EC) for the four seasons and organic aerosol components (OA) for the last two seasons show that all models generally underestimate the measured concentrations. The maximum underestimation of EC is about 60% and up to about 80% for total organic matter (TOM). The underestimation of TOM outside of highly polluted area is a consequence of an underestimation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), in particular of its main contributor: biogenic secondary aerosol (BSOA). This result is independent on the SOA modelling approach used and season. The concentrations and daily cycles of total primary organic matter (TPOM) are generally better reproduced by the models since they used the same anthropogenic emissions. However, the combination of emissions and model formulation leads to overestimate TPOM concentrations in 2009 for most of the models. All models capture relatively well the SOA daily cycles at rural stations mainly due to the spatial resolution used in the simulations. For the investigated carbonaceous aerosol compounds, the differences between the concentrations simulated by different models are lower than the differences between the concentrations simulated with a model for different seasons. © 2019 The Authorseng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6986
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6033
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100018
dc.relation.essn2590-1621
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric environment: X 2 (2019)eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectAerosolseng
dc.subjectAir qualityeng
dc.subjectAtmospheric chemistryeng
dc.subjectBiogeochemistryeng
dc.subjectBiological materialseng
dc.subjectOrganic compoundseng
dc.subjectQuality assuranceeng
dc.subjectQuality controleng
dc.subjectElementaleng
dc.subjectcarboneng
dc.subjectModel inter comparisonseng
dc.subjectModel validationeng
dc.subjectOrganic aerosoleng
dc.subjectSecondary organic aerosolseng
dc.subjectAtmospheric movementseng
dc.subjectcarboneng
dc.subjectorganic mattereng
dc.subjectaerosoleng
dc.subjectair qualityeng
dc.subjectanthropogenic sourceeng
dc.subjectatmospheric modelingeng
dc.subjectatmospheric pollutioneng
dc.subjectconcentration (composition)eng
dc.subjectelemental carboneng
dc.subjectmodeleng
dc.subjectvalidationeng
dc.subjectorganic mattereng
dc.subjectphysicochemical propertyeng
dc.subjectseasonal variationeng
dc.subjectspatial resolutioneng
dc.subjectair pollutanteng
dc.subjectair qualityeng
dc.subjectArticleeng
dc.subjectcarbonaceous aerosoleng
dc.subjectclimateeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleEURODELTA III exercise: An evaluation of air quality models’ capacity to reproduce the carbonaceous aerosoleng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric environment: Xeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EURODELTA III exercise_An evaluation of air quality models’ capacity to reproduce the carbonaceous aerosol.pdf
Size:
8.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: