Scanning electron microscopy preparation of the cellular actin cortex: A quantitative comparison between critical point drying and hexamethyldisilazane drying

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee0254165
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorSchu, Moritz
dc.contributor.authorTerriac, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorPaschke, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorLautenschläger, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorFlormann, Daniel A.D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T12:41:26Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T12:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe cellular cortex is an approximately 200-nm-thick actin network that lies just beneath the cell membrane. It is responsible for the mechanical properties of cells, and as such, it is involved in many cellular processes, including cell migration and cellular interactions with the environment. To develop a clear view of this dense structure, high-resolution imaging is essential. As one such technique, electron microscopy, involves complex sample preparation procedures. The final drying of these samples has significant influence on potential artifacts, like cell shrinkage and the formation of artifactual holes in the actin cortex. In this study, we compared the three most used final sample drying procedures: critical-point drying (CPD), CPD with lens tissue (CPD-LT), and hexamethyldisilazane drying. We show that both hexamethyldisilazane and CPD-LT lead to fewer artifactual mesh holes within the actin cortex than CPD. Moreover, CPD-LT leads to significant reduction in cell height compared to hexamethyldisilazane and CPD. We conclude that the final drying procedure should be chosen according to the reduction in cell height, and so CPD-LT, or according to the spatial separation of the single layers of the actin cortex, and so hexamethyldisilazane.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8214
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7252
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSan Francisco, California, US : PLOS
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254165
dc.relation.essn1932-6203
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLOS ONE 16 (2021), Nr. 7
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectactineng
dc.subjecthexamethyldisilazaneeng
dc.subjectorganosilicon derivativeeng
dc.subjectunclassified drugeng
dc.subjectactineng
dc.subjecthexamethylsilazaneeng
dc.subjectorganosilicon derivativeeng
dc.subjectArticleeng
dc.subjectcell dehydrationeng
dc.subjectcell fixationeng
dc.subjectcell membraneeng
dc.subjectcell permeabilizationeng
dc.subjectcell sizeeng
dc.subjectcell structureeng
dc.subjectcellular cortexeng
dc.subjectchemical procedureseng
dc.subjectcomparative studyeng
dc.subjectconcentration (parameter)eng
dc.subjectcritical point dryingeng
dc.subjectincubation timeeng
dc.subjectprocedures concerning cellseng
dc.subjectquantitative analysiseng
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyeng
dc.subjectstructure analysiseng
dc.subjectartifacteng
dc.subjectcell cultureeng
dc.subjectchemistryeng
dc.subjectdesiccationeng
dc.subjectfreeze dryingeng
dc.subjecthumaneng
dc.subjectprocedureseng
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyeng
dc.subjectspecimen handlingeng
dc.subjectActinseng
dc.subjectArtifactseng
dc.subjectCells, Culturedeng
dc.subjectDesiccationeng
dc.subjectFreeze Dryingeng
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningeng
dc.subjectOrganosilicon Compoundseng
dc.subjectSpecimen Handlingeng
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.titleScanning electron microscopy preparation of the cellular actin cortex: A quantitative comparison between critical point drying and hexamethyldisilazane dryingeng
dc.typearticleeng]
dc.typeTexteng]
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePLOS ONE
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINMger
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheitger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Scanning_electron_microscopy_preparation.pdf
Size:
3.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections