Human alterations of the terrestrial water cycle through land management

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage43eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume18eng
dc.contributor.authorRost, S.
dc.contributor.authorGerten, D.
dc.contributor.authorHeyder, U.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-03T06:36:52Z
dc.date.available2020-08-03T06:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThis study quantifies current and potential future changes in transpiration, evaporation, interception loss and river discharge in response to land use change, irrigation and climate change, by performing several distinct simulations within the consistent hydrology and biosphere modeling framework LPJmL (Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land). We distinguished two irrigation simulations: a water limited one in which irrigation was restricted by local renewable water resources (ILIM), and a potential one in which no such limitation was assumed but withdrawals from deep groundwater or remote rivers allowed (IPOT). We found that the effect of historical land use change as compared to potential natural vegetation was pronounced, including a reduction in interception loss and transpiration by 25.9% and 10.6%, respectively, whereas river discharge increased by 6.6% (climate conditions of 1991-2000). Furthermore, we estimated that about 1170km3yr-1 of irrigation water could be withdrawn from local renewable water resources (in ILIM), which resulted in a reduction of river discharge by 1.5%. However, up to 1660km3yr-1 of water withdrawals were required in addition under the assumption that optimal growth of irrigated crops was sustained (IPOT), which resulted in a slight net increase in global river discharge by 2.0% due to return flows. Under the HadCM3 A2 climate and emission scenario, climate change alone will decrease total evapotranspiration by 1.5% and river discharge by 0.9% in 2046-2055 compared to 1991-2000 average due to changes in precipitation patterns, a decrease in global precipitation amount, and the net effect of CO2 fertilization. A doubling of agricultural land in 2046-2055 compared to 1991-2000 average as proposed by the IMAGE land use change scenario will result in a decrease in total evapotranspiration by 2.5% and in an increase in river discharge by 3.9%. That is, the effects of land use change in the future will be comparable in magnitude to the effects of climate change in this particular scenario. On present irrigated areas future water withdrawal will increase especially in regions where climate changes towards warmer and dryer conditions will be pronounced.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/5338
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/3967
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherGöttingen : Copernicus GmbHeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-18-43-2008
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvances in Geosciences 18 (2008)eng
dc.relation.issn1680-7340
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectland use changeeng
dc.subjectclimate changeeng
dc.subjectirrigationeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleHuman alterations of the terrestrial water cycle through land managementeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAdvances in Geoscienceseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rost et al 2008, Human alterations of the terrestrial water cycle.pdf
Size:
515.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: