Hemispheric and Seasonal Contrast in Cloud Thermodynamic Phase From A‐Train Spaceborne Instruments

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee2020JD034322eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume126eng
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Diego
dc.contributor.authorSenf, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorTegen, Ina
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T13:15:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T13:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAerosol-cloud interactions are an important source of uncertainty in current climate models. To understand and quantify the influence of ice-nucleating particles in cloud glaciation, it is crucial to have a reliable estimation of the hemispheric and seasonal contrast in cloud top phase, which is believed to result from the higher dust aerosol loading in boreal spring. For this reason, we locate and quantify these contrasts by combining three different A-Train cloud-phase products for the period 2007–2010. These products rely on a spaceborne lidar, a lidar-radar synergy, and a radiometer-polarimeter synergy. We show that the cloud-phase from the product combination is more reliable and that the estimation of the hemispheric and seasonal contrast has a lower error compared to the individual products. To quantify the contrast in cloud-phase, we use the hemispheric difference in ice cloud frequency normalized by the liquid cloud frequency in the southern hemisphere between −42 °C and 0 °C. In the midlatitudes, from −15 to −30 °C, the hemispheric contrasts increase with decreasing temperature. At −30 °C, the hemispheric contrast varies from 29% to 39% for the individual cloud-phase products and from 52% to 73% for the product combination. Similarly, in the northern hemisphere, we assess the seasonal contrast between spring and fall normalized by the liquid cloud frequency during fall. At −30 °C, the seasonal contrast ranges from 21% to 39% for the individual cloud-phase products and from 54% to 75% for the product combination.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8297
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7335
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherHoboken, NJ : Wileyeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034322
dc.relation.essn2169-8996
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJGR : Atmospheres 126 (2021), Nr. 6eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectcloud glaciationeng
dc.subjectcloud-phaseeng
dc.subjecthemispheric contrasteng
dc.subjectheterogeneous freezingeng
dc.subjectice particleseng
dc.subjectINPeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleHemispheric and Seasonal Contrast in Cloud Thermodynamic Phase From A‐Train Spaceborne Instrumentseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJGR : Atmosphereseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hemispheric_and_Seasonal_Contrast.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: