Side effects by oral application of atmospheric pressure plasma on the mucosa in mice

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee0215099eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePLOS ONEeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume14eng
dc.contributor.authorJablonowski, Lukasz
dc.contributor.authorKocher, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Axel
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorDombrowski, Frank
dc.contributor.authorvon Woedtke, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Antje
dc.contributor.authorRupf, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorEvert, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorEvert, Katja
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T08:16:35Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T08:16:35Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractCold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) has been investigated with promising results for peri-implant diseases treatment. However, prior to in-vivo applications of CAP sources in humans, short-term harmful mucosal damage or other unwanted side effects have to be reviewed. 180 male mice (B6C3F1) were divided into twelve treatment groups (n = 15). The right buccal cheek mucosa was treated with CAP. The first and second group each received continuous 10 sec irradiation with 2 different plasma sources (kINPen09, PS-MWM). The third group was treated with the kINPen09 for one minute. Control groups were treated with a corresponding dose of ultraviolet light for 8 seconds or 48 seconds and the other one was left untreated. The animals were weighed before and after treatment. The animals were sacrificed one day or one week after exposure. Stained tissue samples were histologically examined for tissue damage independently by two experienced pathologists. One day after CAP treatment histological analysis showed focal mucosal erosion with superficial ulceration and necrosis accompanied by a mild inflammatory reaction. One week after CAP treatment, the mucosal defects were completely re-epithelialized, associated with remnants of granulation tissue in the stroma irrespective of treatment duration. Furthermore, no cytological atypia was found and no severe weight loss occurred. The control groups did not show any alterations at all. CAP treatment led to a superficial mucosal damage that healed within few days. Nonetheless, further long-term experiments are necessary to exclude undesirable side effects after longer observation time. Particularly, potential carcinogenic effects must be ruled out prior to the application of CAP treatment in daily dental practice.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7677
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6724
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSan Francisco, California, US : PLOSeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215099
dc.relation.essn1932-6203
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.subject.otherCold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP)eng
dc.subject.otherperi-implant diseaseseng
dc.subject.otherCAP treatmenteng
dc.titleSide effects by oral application of atmospheric pressure plasma on the mucosa in miceeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINPeng
wgl.contributorIOMeng
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheiteng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Side effects by oral application of atmospheric pressure plasma on the mucosa in mice.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections