Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage77
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7942
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleNatureeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage84
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume613
dc.contributor.authorGu, Baojing
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiuming
dc.contributor.authorLam, Shu Kee
dc.contributor.authorYu, Yingliang
dc.contributor.authorvan Grinsven, Hans J. M.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shaohui
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoxi
dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, Benjamin Leon
dc.contributor.authorWang, Sitong
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Jiakun
dc.contributor.authorRen, Chenchen
dc.contributor.authorBouwman, Lex
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Wim
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianming
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Deli
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T08:15:20Z
dc.date.available2023-04-04T08:15:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractCropland is a main source of global nitrogen pollution1,2. Mitigating nitrogen pollution from global croplands is a grand challenge because of the nature of non-point-source pollution from millions of farms and the constraints to implementing pollution-reduction measures, such as lack of financial resources and limited nitrogen-management knowledge of farmers3. Here we synthesize 1,521 field observations worldwide and identify 11 key measures that can reduce nitrogen losses from croplands to air and water by 30–70%, while increasing crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by 10–30% and 10–80%, respectively. Overall, adoption of this package of measures on global croplands would allow the production of 17 ± 3 Tg (1012 g) more crop nitrogen (20% increase) with 22 ± 4 Tg less nitrogen fertilizer used (21% reduction) and 26 ± 5 Tg less nitrogen pollution (32% reduction) to the environment for the considered base year of 2015. These changes could gain a global societal benefit of 476 ± 123 billion US dollars (USD) for food supply, human health, ecosystems and climate, with net mitigation costs of only 19 ± 5 billion USD, of which 15 ± 4 billion USD fertilizer saving offsets 44% of the gross mitigation cost. To mitigate nitrogen pollution from croplands in the future, innovative policies such as a nitrogen credit system (NCS) could be implemented to select, incentivize and, where necessary, subsidize the adoption of these measures.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11892
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10925
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLondon [u.a.] : Nature Publ. Group
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05481-8
dc.relation.essn1476-4687
dc.relation.issn0028-0836
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.subject.otherAgricultureeng
dc.subject.otherChinaeng
dc.subject.otherCost-Benefit Analysiseng
dc.subject.otherCrops, Agriculturaleng
dc.subject.otherEcosystemeng
dc.subject.otherFertilizerseng
dc.subject.otherHumanseng
dc.subject.otherNitrogeneng
dc.subject.othernonpoint source pollutioneng
dc.subject.otherpollution controleng
dc.titleCost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplandseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectPhysikger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s41586-022-05481-8.pdf
Size:
26.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections