Comparison of surface mass balance of ice sheets simulated by positive-degree-day method and energy balance approach

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage819eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage832eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume13
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Eva
dc.contributor.authorGanopolski, Andrey
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-29T12:06:53Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractGlacial cycles of the late Quaternary are controlled by the asymmetrically varying mass balance of continental ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere. Surface mass balance is governed by processes of ablation and accumulation. Here two ablation schemes, the positive-degree-day (PDD) method and the surface energy balance (SEB) approach, are compared in transient simulations of the last glacial cycle with the Earth system model of intermediate complexity CLIMBER-2. The standard version of the CLIMBER-2 model incorporates the SEB approach and simulates ice volume variations in reasonable agreement with paleoclimate reconstructions during the entire last glacial cycle. Using results from the standard CLIMBER-2 model version, we simulated ablation with the PDD method in offline mode by applying different combinations of three empirical parameters of the PDD scheme. We found that none of the parameter combinations allow us to simulate a surface mass balance of the American and European ice sheets that is similar to that obtained with the standard SEB method. The use of constant values for the empirical PDD parameters led either to too much ablation during the first phase of the last glacial cycle or too little ablation during the final phase. We then substituted the standard SEB scheme in CLIMBER-2 with the PDD scheme and performed a suite of fully interactive (online) simulations of the last glacial cycle with different combinations of PDD parameters. The results of these simulations confirmed the results of the offline simulations: no combination of PDD parameters realistically simulates the evolution of the ice sheets during the entire glacial cycle. The use of constant parameter values in the online simulations leads either to a buildup of too much ice volume at the end of glacial cycle or too little ice volume at the beginning. Even when the model correctly simulates global ice volume at the last glacial maximum (21 ka), it is unable to simulate complete deglaciation during the Holocene. According to our simulations, the SEB approach proves superior for simulations of glacial cycles.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/880
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/653
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMünchen : European Geopyhsical Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-819-2017
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClimate of the Past, Volume 13, Issue 7, Page 819-832eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectablationeng
dc.subjectcomparative studyeng
dc.subjectdeglaciationeng
dc.subjectenergy balanceeng
dc.subjectHoloceneice sheeteng
dc.subjectLast Glacial Maximumeng
dc.subjectlast glaciation mass balance Northern Hemisphereeng
dc.subjectpaleoclimatereeng
dc.subjectconstructioneng
dc.subjectsurface energyeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleComparison of surface mass balance of ice sheets simulated by positive-degree-day method and energy balance approacheng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleClimate of the Pasteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cp-13-819-2017.pdf
Size:
2.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: