Round robin comparison on quantitative nanometer scale magnetic field measurements by magnetic force microscopy

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage166947eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materialseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage12401eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume511eng
dc.contributor.authorHu, X.
dc.contributor.authorDai, G.
dc.contributor.authorSievers, S.
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Scarioni, A.
dc.contributor.authorCorte-León, H.
dc.contributor.authorPuttock, R.
dc.contributor.authorBarton, C.
dc.contributor.authorKazakova, O.
dc.contributor.authorUlvr, M.
dc.contributor.authorKlapetek, P.
dc.contributor.authorHavlíček, M.
dc.contributor.authorNečas, D.
dc.contributor.authorTang, Y.
dc.contributor.authorNeu, V.
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, H.W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T12:25:27Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T12:25:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractMagnetic force microscopy (MFM) can be considered as a standard tool for nano-scale investigation of magnetic domain structures by probing the local stray magnetic field landscape of the measured sample. However, this generally provides only qualitative data. To quantify the stray magnetic fields, the MFM system must be calibrated. To that end, a transfer function (TF) approach was proposed, that, unlike point probe models, fully considers the finite extent of the MFM tip. However, albeit being comprehensive, the TF approach is not yet well established, mainly due to the ambiguities concerning the input parameters and the measurement procedure. Additionally, the calibration process represents an ill-posed problem which requires a regularization that introduces further parameters. In this paper we propose a guideline for quantitative stray field measurements by standard MFM tools in ambient conditions. All steps of the measurement and calibration procedure are detailed, including reference sample and sample under test (SUT) measurements and the data analysis. The suitability of the reference sample used in the present work for calibrated measurements on a sub-micron scale is discussed. A specific regularization approach based on a Pseudo-Wiener Filter is applied and combined with criteria for the numerical determination of a unique regularization parameter. To demonstrate the robustness of such a defined approach, a round robin comparison of magnetic field measurements was conducted by four laboratories. The guideline, the reference sample and the results of the round robin are discussed.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/3564
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/4935
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elsevier B.V.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166947
dc.relation.issn0304-8853
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc530eng
dc.subject.otherComparisoneng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic probe calibrationeng
dc.subject.otherQuantitative magnetic force microscopyeng
dc.subject.otherReference sampleeng
dc.subject.otherStray magnetic fieldeng
dc.subject.otherCalibrationeng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic domainseng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic field measurementeng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic force microscopyeng
dc.subject.otherNanomagneticseng
dc.subject.otherAmbient conditionseng
dc.subject.otherCalibration procedureeng
dc.subject.otherCalibration processeng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic force microscopies (MFM)eng
dc.subject.otherMeasurement procedureseng
dc.subject.otherRegularization approacheng
dc.subject.otherRegularization parameterseng
dc.subject.otherStray magnetic fieldseng
dc.subject.otherMagnetic fieldseng
dc.titleRound robin comparison on quantitative nanometer scale magnetic field measurements by magnetic force microscopyeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIFWDeng
wgl.subjectPhysikeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hu et al 2020, Round robin comparison on quantitative nanometer scale.pdf
Size:
17.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections