A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1169eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue11eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage1179eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume5
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Prajal
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Luís
dc.contributor.authorRybski, Diego
dc.contributor.authorLucht, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorKropp, Jürgen P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T02:37:20Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:21:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractSustainable development goals (SDGs) have set the 2030 agenda to transform our world by tackling multiple challenges humankind is facing to ensure well‐being, economic prosperity, and environmental protection. In contrast to conventional development agendas focusing on a restricted set of dimensions, the SDGs provide a holistic and multidimensional view on development. Hence, interactions among the SDGs may cause diverging results. To analyze the SDG interactions we systematize the identification of synergies and trade‐offs using official SDG indicator data for 227 countries. A significant positive correlation between a pair of SDG indicators is classified as a synergy while a significant negative correlation is classified as a trade‐off. We rank synergies and trade‐offs between SDGs pairs on global and country scales in order to identify the most frequent SDG interactions. For a given SDG, positive correlations between indicator pairs were found to outweigh the negative ones in most countries. Among SDGs the positive and negative correlations between indicator pairs allowed for the identification of particular global patterns. SDG 1 (No poverty) has synergetic relationship with most of the other goals, whereas SDG 12 (Responsible consumption and production) is the goal most commonly associated with trade‐offs. The attainment of the SDG agenda will greatly depend on whether the identified synergies among the goals can be leveraged. In addition, the highlighted trade‐offs, which constitute obstacles in achieving the SDGs, need to be negotiated and made structurally nonobstructive by deeper changes in the current strategies.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipLeibniz_Fondseng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/731
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/874
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherHoboken, NJ : Wileyeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEarth’s Future, Volume 5, Issue 11, Page 1169-1179eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectSDGseng
dc.subjectsynergieseng
dc.subjecttrade‐offseng
dc.subjectAgenda 2030eng
dc.subjectinteractionseng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleA systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactionseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEarth’s Futureeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pradhan_et_al-2017-Earth%27s_Future.pdf
Size:
2.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: