Understanding the weather signal in national crop‐yield variability

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage605eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage616eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume5
dc.contributor.authorFrieler, Katja
dc.contributor.authorSchauberger, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorArneth, Almut
dc.contributor.authorBalkovič, Juraj
dc.contributor.authorChryssanthacopoulos, James
dc.contributor.authorDeryng, Delphine
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorFolberth, Christian
dc.contributor.authorKhabarov, Nikolay
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorOlin, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorPugh, Thomas A.M.
dc.contributor.authorSchaphoff, Sibyll
dc.contributor.authorSchewe, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Erwin
dc.contributor.authorWarszawski, Lila
dc.contributor.authorLevermann, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-05T12:54:53Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:20:02Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractYear‐to‐year variations in crop yields can have major impacts on the livelihoods of subsistence farmers and may trigger significant global price fluctuations, with severe consequences for people in developing countries. Fluctuations can be induced by weather conditions, management decisions, weeds, diseases, and pests. Although an explicit quantification and deeper understanding of weather‐induced crop‐yield variability is essential for adaptation strategies, so far it has only been addressed by empirical models. Here, we provide conservative estimates of the fraction of reported national yield variabilities that can be attributed to weather by state‐of‐the‐art, process‐based crop model simulations. We find that observed weather variations can explain more than 50% of the variability in wheat yields in Australia, Canada, Spain, Hungary, and Romania. For maize, weather sensitivities exceed 50% in seven countries, including the United States. The explained variance exceeds 50% for rice in Japan and South Korea and for soy in Argentina. Avoiding water stress by simulating yields assuming full irrigation shows that water limitation is a major driver of the observed variations in most of these countries. Identifying the mechanisms leading to crop‐yield fluctuations is not only fundamental for dampening fluctuations, but is also important in the context of the debate on the attribution of loss and damage to climate change. Since process‐based crop models not only account for weather influences on crop yields, but also provide options to represent human‐management measures, they could become essential tools for differentiating these drivers, and for exploring options to reduce future yield fluctuations.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1364
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/736
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherHoboken, NJ : Wileyeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000525
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEarth’s Future, Volume 5, Issue 6, Page 605-616eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectcrop yield variabilityeng
dc.subjectweather sensitivityeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleUnderstanding the weather signal in national crop‐yield variabilityeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEarth’s Futureeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Frieler_et_al-2017-Earth%26apos%3Bs_Future.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: