Estimating the contribution of photochemical particle formation to ultrafine particle number averages in an urban atmosphere

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage154
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage166
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume512–513
dc.contributor.authorBirmili, W.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T06:45:58Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:22:04Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractUltrafine particles (UFPs, diameter < 100 nm) have gained major attention in the environmental health discussion due to a number of suspected health effects. Observations of UFPs in urban air reveal the presence of several, time-dependent particle sources. In order to attribute measured UFP number concentrations to different source type contributions, we analyzed observations collected at a triplet of observation sites (roadside, urban background, rural) in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Photochemical new particle formation (NPF) events can be the overwhelming source of UFP particles on particular days, and were identified on the basis of characteristic patterns in the particle number size distribution data. A subsequent segmentation of the diurnal cycles of UFP concentration yielded a quantitative contribution of NPF events to daily, monthly, and annual mean values. At roadside, we obtained source contributions to the annual mean UFP number concentration (diameter range 5–100 nm) for photochemical NPF events (7%), local traffic (52%), diffuse urban sources (20%), and regional background (21%). The relative contribution of NPF events rises when moving away from roadside to the urban background and rural sites (14 and 30%, respectively). Their contribution also increases when considering only fresh UFPs (5–20 nm) (21% at the urban background site), and conversely decreases when considering UFPs at bigger sizes (20–100 nm) (8%). A seasonal analysis showed that NPF events have their greatest importance on UFP number concentration in the months May–August, accounting for roughly half of the fresh UFPs (5–20 nm) at the urban background location. The simplistic source apportionment presented here might serve to better characterize exposure to ambient UFPs in future epidemiological studies.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/928
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/910
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.009
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience of The Total Environment, Volume 512–513, Page 154-166eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectUltrafine aerosoleng
dc.subjectAerosol particleseng
dc.subjectParticle number countseng
dc.subjectUrban atmosphereeng
dc.subjectPhotochemical particle formationeng
dc.subjectTraffic emissions Differential mobility particle sizereng
dc.subjectHealth implicationseng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleEstimating the contribution of photochemical particle formation to ultrafine particle number averages in an urban atmosphereeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleScience of The Total Environmenteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0048969715000121-main.pdf
Size:
2.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: