Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies

dc.bibliographicCitation.date2015
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage62
dc.bibliographicCitation.issueA
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleTechnological forecasting and social change : an international journaleng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage72
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume90
dc.contributor.authorBertram, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Nils
dc.contributor.authorLuderer, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorRiahi, Keywan
dc.contributor.authorIsaac, Morna
dc.contributor.authorEom, Jiyong
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractStringent long-term climate targets necessitate a limit on cumulative emissions in this century for which sufficient policy signals are lacking. Using nine energy-economy models, we explore how policies pursued during the next two decades impact long-term transformation pathways towards stringent long-term climate targets. Less stringent near-term policies (i.e., those with larger emissions) consume more of the long-term cumulative emissions budget in the 2010–2030 period, which increases the likelihood of overshooting the budget and the urgency of reducing GHG emissions after 2030. Furthermore, the larger near-term GHG emissions associated with less stringent policies are generated primarily by additional coal-based electricity generation. Therefore, to be successful in meeting the long-term target despite near-term emissions reductions that are weaker than those implied by cost-optimal mitigation pathways, models must prematurely retire significant coal capacity while rapidly ramping up low-carbon technologies between 2030 and 2050 and remove large quantities of CO2 from the atmosphere in the latter half of the century. While increased energy efficiency lowers mitigation costs considerably, even with weak near-term policies, it does not substantially reduce the short-term reliance on coal electricity. However, increased energy efficiency does allow the energy system more flexibility in mitigating emissions and, thus, facilitates the post-2030 transition.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9784
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/8822
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001
dc.relation.essn0040-1625
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc600
dc.subject.otherAMPEREeng
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide emissionseng
dc.subject.otherClimate change mitigationeng
dc.subject.otherEnergy efficiencyeng
dc.subject.otherEnergy systems modelingeng
dc.subject.otherIntegrated assessmenteng
dc.titleCarbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policieseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKger
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Carbon_lock-in_through.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: