Aerosol dynamics and dispersion of radioactive particles

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage5173eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage5193eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume21eng
dc.contributor.authorSchoenberg, Pontus von
dc.contributor.authorTunved, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGrahn, Håkan
dc.contributor.authorWiedensohler, Alfred
dc.contributor.authorKrejci, Radovan
dc.contributor.authorBrännström, Niklas
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T06:57:36Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T06:57:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn the event of a failure of a nuclear power plant with release of radioactive material into the atmosphere, dispersion modelling is used to understand how the released radioactivity is spread. For the dispersion of particles, Lagrangian particle dispersion models (LPDMs) are commonly used, in which model particles, representing the released material, are transported through the atmosphere. These model particles are usually inert and undergo only first-order processes such as dry deposition and simplified wet deposition along the path through the atmosphere. Aerosol dynamic processes including coagulation, condensational growth, chemical interactions, formation of new particles and interaction with new aerosol sources are usually neglected in such models. The objective of this study is to analyse the impact of these advanced aerosol dynamic processes if they were to be included in LPDM simulations for use in radioactive preparedness. In this investigation, a fictitious failure of a nuclear power plant is studied for three geographically and atmospherically different sites. The incident was simulated with a Lagrangian single-trajectory box model with a new simulation for each hour throughout a year to capture seasonal variability of meteorology and variation in the ambient aerosol. (a) We conclude that modelling of wet deposition by incorporating an advanced cloud parameterization is advisable, since it significantly influence simulated levels of airborne and deposited activity including radioactive hotspots, and (b) we show that inclusion of detailed ambient-aerosol dynamics can play a large role in the model result in simulations that adopt a more detailed representation of aerosol–cloud interactions. The results highlight a potential necessity for implementation of more detailed representation of general aerosol dynamic processes into LPDMs in order to cover the full range of possible environmental characteristics that can apply during a release of radionuclides into the atmosphere.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8229
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7267
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : European Geosciences Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5173-2021
dc.relation.essn1680-7324
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21 (2021), Nr. 6eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectaerosoleng
dc.subjectcloudeng
dc.subjectdynamic propertyeng
dc.subjectmeteorologyeng
dc.subjectnuclear power planteng
dc.subjectradioactivityeng
dc.subjectseasonal variationeng
dc.subjectwet depositioneng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleAerosol dynamics and dispersion of radioactive particleseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acp-21-5173-2021.pdf
Size:
6.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: