Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage9641eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue16eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage9663eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume20eng
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorTurnock, Steven
dc.contributor.authorNabat, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorNeubauer, David
dc.contributor.authorLohmann, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorOlivié, Dirk
dc.contributor.authorOshima, Naga
dc.contributor.authorMichou, Martine
dc.contributor.authorWu, Tongwen
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jie
dc.contributor.authorTakemura, Toshihiko
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Michael
dc.contributor.authorTsigaridis, Kostas
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Susanne E.
dc.contributor.authorEmmons, Louisa
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, Larry
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Vaishali
dc.contributor.authorvan Noije, Twan
dc.contributor.authorBergman, Tommi
dc.contributor.authorLamarque, Jean-Francois
dc.contributor.authorZanis, Prodromos
dc.contributor.authorTegen, Ina
dc.contributor.authorWestervelt, Daniel M.
dc.contributor.authorLe Sager, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorGood, Peter
dc.contributor.authorShim, Sungbo
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorAkritidis, Dimitris
dc.contributor.authorGeorgoulias, Aristeidis K.
dc.contributor.authorDeushi, Makoto
dc.contributor.authorSentman, Lori T.
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Jasmin G.
dc.contributor.authorFujimori, Shinichiro
dc.contributor.authorCollins, William J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T12:46:04Z
dc.date.available2021-09-30T12:46:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIt is important to understand how future environmental policies will impact both climate change and air pollution. Although targeting near-term climate forcers (NTCFs), defined here as aerosols, tropospheric ozone, and precursor gases, should improve air quality, NTCF reductions will also impact climate. Prior assessments of the impact of NTCF mitigation on air quality and climate have been limited. This is related to the idealized nature of some prior studies, simplified treatment of aerosols and chemically reactive gases, as well as a lack of a sufficiently large number of models to quantify model diversity and robust responses. Here, we quantify the 2015-2055 climate and air quality effects of non-methane NTCFs using nine state-of-the-art chemistry-climate model simulations conducted for the Aerosol and Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP). Simulations are driven by two future scenarios featuring similar increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs) but with weak (SSP3-7.0) versus strong (SSP3-7.0-lowNTCF) levels of air quality control measures. As SSP3-7.0 lacks climate policy and has the highest levels of NTCFs, our results (e.g., surface warming) represent an upper bound. Unsurprisingly, we find significant improvements in air quality under NTCF mitigation (strong versus weak air quality controls). Surface fine particulate matter (PM2:5) and ozone (O3) decrease by 2:20:32 ugm3 and 4:60:88 ppb, respectively (changes quoted here are for the entire 2015-2055 time period; uncertainty represents the 95% confidence interval), over global land surfaces, with larger reductions in some regions including south and southeast Asia. Non-methane NTCF mitigation, however, leads to additional climate change due to the removal of aerosol which causes a net warming effect, including global mean surface temperature and precipitation increases of 0:250:12K and 0:030:012mmd1, respectively. Similarly, increases in extreme weather indices, including the hottest and wettest days, also occur. Regionally, the largest warming and wetting occurs over Asia, including central and north Asia (0:660:20K and 0:030:02mmd1), south Asia (0:470:16K and 0:170:09mmd1), and east Asia (0:460:20K and 0:150:06mmd1). Relatively large warming and wetting of the Arctic also occur at 0:590:36K and 0:040:02mmd1, respectively. Similar surface warming occurs in model simulations with aerosol-only mitigation, implying weak cooling due to ozone reductions. Our findings suggest that future policies that aggressively target non-methane NTCF reductions will improve air quality but will lead to additional surface warming, particularly in Asia and the Arctic. Policies that address other NTCFs including methane, as well as carbon dioxide emissions, must also be adopted to meet climate mitigation goals. © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6956
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6003
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : EGUeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9641-2020
dc.relation.essn1680-7324
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric chemistry and physics 20 (200), Nr. 16eng
dc.relation.issn1680-7316
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectaerosoleng
dc.subjectair qualityeng
dc.subjectatmospheric pollutioneng
dc.subjectclimate changeeng
dc.subjectclimate forcingeng
dc.subjectfuture prospecteng
dc.subjectmethaneeng
dc.subjectAsiager
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleClimate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcerseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric chemistry and physicseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers.pdf
Size:
10.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: