Corrigendum: Air quality and health implications of 1.5 °C–2 °C climate pathways under considerations of ageing population: a multi-model scenario analysis (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 045005)

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage059501
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorRafaj, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKiesewetter, Gregor
dc.contributor.authorKrey, Volker
dc.contributor.authorSchoepp, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorBertram, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorDrouet, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorFricko, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorFujimori, Shinichiro
dc.contributor.authorHarmsen, Mathijs
dc.contributor.authorHilaire, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorHuppmann, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorKlimont, Zbigniew
dc.contributor.authorKolp, Peter
dc.contributor.authorAleluia Reis, Lara
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, Detlef
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T08:27:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-24T08:27:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractWe have identified an error in the text of section 3.3 where the health co-benefits of 1.5 °C + MFR scenario in the whole of Asia are compared to the reference. In the last paragraph of the section 3.3 (page 11), the manuscript states that 'Across the Asia domain, this reduction is approximately 2.5-3 million cases or 40%-51% depending on the IAM used'. Unfortunately, the numbers quoted here were accidentally taken from a sensitivity analysis using different integrated exposure-response curves (GBD-2010, obtained from Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network 2013), which have not been used in the results shown in the paper-our results are based on the GBD-2013 version, reported by Forouzanfar et al (2015). The correct statement is: 'Across the Asia domain, this reduction is approximately 1.2-1.5 million cases or 33%-42% depending on the IAM used'. The same correction applies to the statement in the Conclusions section 5 (4th paragraph, page 14), which should read: 'The 1.5 °C + MFR scenario decreases premature deaths by 33%-42% across Asia, compared to NPi'.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11741
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10775
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publ.
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfac2
dc.relation.essn1748-9326
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental research letters : ERL 16 (2021), Nr. 5
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc690
dc.titleCorrigendum: Air quality and health implications of 1.5 °C–2 °C climate pathways under considerations of ageing population: a multi-model scenario analysis (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 045005)eng
dc.typearticle
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental research letters : ERL
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Corrigendum_Air_quality_and_health_implications.pdf
Size:
474.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: