Effects of finite source rupture on landslide triggering: the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage463eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage486eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10eng
dc.contributor.authorvon Specht, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorVeh, Georg
dc.contributor.authorCotton, Fabrice
dc.contributor.authorKorup, Oliver
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T05:37:17Z
dc.date.available2022-08-19T05:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe propagation of a seismic rupture on a fault introduces spatial variations in the seismic wave field surrounding the fault. This directivity effect results in larger shaking amplitudes in the rupture propagation direction. Its seismic radiation pattern also causes amplitude variations between the strike-normal and strike-parallel components of horizontal ground motion. We investigated the landslide response to these effects during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake (Mw 7.1) in central Kyushu (Japan). Although the distribution of some 1500 earthquake-triggered landslides as a function of rupture distance is consistent with the observed Arias intensity, the landslides were more concentrated to the northeast of the southwest–northeast striking rupture. We examined several landslide susceptibility factors: hillslope inclination, the median amplification factor (MAF) of ground shaking, lithology, land cover, and topographic wetness. None of these factors sufficiently explains the landslide distribution or orientation (aspect), although the landslide head scarps have an elevated hillslope inclination and MAF. We propose a new physics-based ground-motion model (GMM) that accounts for the seismic rupture effects, and we demonstrate that the low-frequency seismic radiation pattern is consistent with the overall landslide distribution. Its spatial pattern is influenced by the rupture directivity effect, whereas landslide aspect is influenced by amplitude variations between the fault-normal and fault-parallel motion at frequencies <2 Hz. This azimuth dependence implies that comparable landslide concentrations can occur at different distances from the rupture. This quantitative link between the prevalent landslide aspect and the low-frequency seismic radiation pattern can improve coseismic landslide hazard assessment.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10085
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9123
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherGöttingen : Copernicus Publ.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-463-2019
dc.relation.essn1869-9529
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSolid earth : SE 10 (2019), Nr. 2eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectEarthquakeseng
dc.subjectFaultingeng
dc.subjectLithologyeng
dc.subjectRadiation effectseng
dc.subjectAmplification factorseng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleEffects of finite source rupture on landslide triggering: the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquakeeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleSolid earth : SEeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Effects_of_finite_source.pdf
Size:
13.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: