Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young fluvial deposits of the Middle Elbe River Flood Plains using different age models

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage36eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleGeochronometria : journal on methods and applications of absolute chronologyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage56eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume41eng
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorPflanz, Dorthe
dc.contributor.authorWeniger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Brigitte
dc.contributor.authorKrüger, Frank
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yue-Gau
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T08:04:18Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T08:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractIn the last few decades optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating has become an im-portant tool in geochronological studies. The great advantage of the method, i.e. dating the deposi-tional age of sediments directly, can be impaired by incomplete bleaching of grains. This can result in a scattered distribution of equivalent doses (DE), leading to incorrect estimation of the depositional age. Thoroughly tested protocols as well as good data analysis with adequate statistical methods are important to overcome this problem. In this study, samples from young fluvial sand and flood plain deposits from the Elbe River in northern Germany were investigated to compare its depositional ages from different age models with well-known historical dates. Coarse grain quartz (100-200 μm and 150-250 μm) and polymineral fine grains (4-11 μm) were dated using the single aliquot regenerative (SAR) dose protocol. The paleodose (DP) was calculated from the DE data set using different ap-proaches. Results were compared with the development of the Elbe River, which is well-documented by historical records and maps covering the last 1,000 years. Depending on the statistical approach it can be demonstrated that depositional ages significantly differ from the most likely depositional age. For the investigated coarse grain quartz samples all ages calculated from the MAM-3UL, including their uncertainties, are within the historical documented age. Results of the polymineral fine grain samples are overestimating the historically documented depositional age, indicating undetectable in-complete bleaching. This study shows the importance of using an adequate statistical approach to cal-culate reliable OSL ages from fluvial sediments. © 2013 Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. All rights reserved.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8023
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7064
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWarsaw : De Gruytereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-013-0140-7
dc.relation.essn1897-1695
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc620eng
dc.subject.ddc690eng
dc.subject.otherAge modeleng
dc.subject.otherElbe River floodplaineng
dc.subject.otherFluvial sandeng
dc.subject.otherNorth Germanyeng
dc.subject.otherOptically stimulated luminescence datingeng
dc.titleOptically stimulated luminescence dating of young fluvial deposits of the Middle Elbe River Flood Plains using different age modelseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorLIAGeng
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.2478_s13386-013-0140-7.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: