Experimental assessment of a micro-pulse lidar system in comparison with reference lidar measurements for aerosol optical properties retrieval

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage5225eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric Measurement Techniqueseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage5239eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume14eng
dc.contributor.authorCórdoba-Jabonero, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorAnsmann, Albert
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Cristofer
dc.contributor.authorBaars, Holger
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cayuela, María-Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorEngelmann, Ronny
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T14:20:49Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T14:20:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractSimultaneous observations of a polarized micro-pulse lidar (P-MPL) system and two reference European Aerosol Research Lidar Network lidars running at the Leipzig site Germany, 51.4g gN, 12.4g gE; 125gmga.s.l.) were performed during a comprehensive 2-month field intercomparison campaign in summer 2019. An experimental assessment regarding both the overlap (OVP) correction of the P-MPL signal profiles and the volume linear depolarization ratio (VLDR) analysis, together with its impact on the retrieval of the aerosol optical properties, is achieved; the experimental procedure used is also described. The optimal lidar-specific OVP function is experimentally determined, highlighting that the one delivered by the P-MPL manufacturer cannot be used long. Among the OVP functions examined, the averaged function between those obtained from the comparison of the P-MPL observations with those of the other two reference lidars seems to be the best proxy at both near- and far-field ranges. In addition, the impact of the OVP function on the accuracy of the retrieved profiles of the total particle backscatter coefficient (PBC) and the particle linear depolarization ratio (PLDR) is examined. The VLDR profile is obtained and compared with that derived from the reference lidar, showing that it needs to be corrected by a small offset value with good accuracy. Once P-MPL measurements are optimally (OVP, VLDR) corrected, both the PBC and PLDR profiles can be accurately derived and are in good agreement with reference aerosol retrievals. Overall, as a systematic requirement for lidar systems, an adequate OVP function determination and VLDR testing analysis needs to be performed on a regular basis to correct the P-MPL measurements in order to derive suitable aerosol products. A dust event observed in Leipzig in June 2019 is used for illustration.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8242
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7280
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : European Geosciences Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5225-2021
dc.relation.essn1867-8548
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.otheraerosol propertyeng
dc.subject.otherassessment methodeng
dc.subject.otherbackscattereng
dc.subject.othercomparative studyeng
dc.subject.otherexperimental studyeng
dc.subject.otherlidareng
dc.subject.otheroptical propertyeng
dc.subject.otherGermanyeng
dc.subject.otherLeipzigeng
dc.subject.otherSaxonyeng
dc.titleExperimental assessment of a micro-pulse lidar system in comparison with reference lidar measurements for aerosol optical properties retrievaleng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
amt-14-5225-2021.pdf
Size:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: