Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic

Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic

Files

pnas-2217404119.pdf(156.6 KB)

Date

2022

Authors

Depledge, Joanna

Ebi, Kristie L.

Gibbins, Goodwin

Kohler, Timothy A.

Rockström, Johan

Scheffer, Marten

Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim

Volume

119

Issue

49

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Washington, DC : National Acad. of Sciences

Link to publishers version

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217404119

Abstract

[No abstract available]

URI

https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11412
http://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10446

Citation

Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., et al. (2022). Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic (Washington, DC : National Acad. of Sciences). Washington, DC : National Acad. of Sciences. https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.2217404119

Collections

License

CC BY 4.0 Unported

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0