Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic

Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic

Files

pnas-2217404119.pdf(156.6 KB)

Date

2022

Authors

Depledge, Joanna

Ebi, Kristie L.

Gibbins, Goodwin

Kohler, Timothy A.

Rockström, Johan

Scheffer, Marten

Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim

Volume

119

Issue

49

Publisher

Washington, DC : National Acad. of Sciences

Link to publishers version

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217404119

Abstract

[No abstract available]

URI

https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11412
http://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10446

Citation

Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., et al. (2022). Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic. 119(49). https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.2217404119

Collections

License

CC BY 4.0 Unported

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0