The atmospheric background situation in northern Scandinavia during January/February 2003 in the context of the MaCWAVE campaign

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1189
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage1197
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume24
dc.contributor.authorBlum, U.
dc.contributor.authorBaumgarten, G.
dc.contributor.authorSchöch, A.
dc.contributor.authorKirkwood, S.
dc.contributor.authorNaujokat, B.
dc.contributor.authorFricke, K.H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T10:43:59Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T12:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThe atmosphere background wind field controls the propagation of gravity waves from the troposphere through the stratosphere into the mesosphere. During January 2003 the MaCWAVE campaign took place at Esrange, with the purpose of observing vertically ascending waves induced by orography. Temperature data from the U. Bonn lidar at Esrange (68° N/21° E) and the ALOMAR RMR lidar (69° N/16° E), wind data from Esrange MST radar ESRAD, as well as wind data from the ECMWF T106 model, are used to analyse the atmospheric background situation and its effect on mountain wave propagation during January/February 2003. Critical levels lead to dissipation of vertically ascending waves, thus mountain waves are not observable above those levels. In the first half of January a minor as well as a major stratospheric warming dominated the meteorological background situation. These warmings led to a wind reversal, thus to critical level filtering and consequently prevented gravity waves from propagating to high altitudes. While the troposphere was not transparent for stationary gravity waves most of the time, there was a period of eight days following the major warming with a transparent stratosphere, with conditions allowing gravity waves generated in the lower troposphere to penetrate the stratosphere up to the stratopause and sometimes even into the lower mesosphere. In the middle of February a minor stratospheric warming occurred, which again led to critical levels such that gravity waves were not able to ascend above the middle stratosphere. Due to the unfavourable troposphere and lower stratosphere conditions for gravity wave excitation and propagation, the source of the observed waves in the middle atmosphere is probably different from orography.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1676
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/4066
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMünchen : European Geopyhsical Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1189-2006
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales Geophysicae, Volume 24, Issue 4, Page 1189-1197eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectgravity waveeng
dc.subjectmesosphereeng
dc.subjectorographic effecteng
dc.subjectstratosphere-troposphere interactioneng
dc.subjectwave propagationeng
dc.subjectwind fieldeng
dc.subject.ddc530eng
dc.titleThe atmospheric background situation in northern Scandinavia during January/February 2003 in the context of the MaCWAVE campaigneng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAnnales Geophysicaeeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIAPeng
wgl.subjectPhysikeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
angeo-24-1189-2006.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections