Two-dimensional particle-in cell/Monte Carlo simulations of a packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure

dc.bibliographicCitation.articleNumber083056
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage083056
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue8
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleNew Journal of Physics
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume17
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Ya
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hong-yu
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Wei
dc.contributor.authorBogaerts, Annemie
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-28T08:42:49Z
dc.date.available2025-02-28T08:42:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe plasma behavior in a parallel-plate dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) is simulated by a two-dimensional particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision model, comparing for the first time an unpacked (empty) DBD with a packed bed DBD, i.e., a DBD filled with dielectric spheres in the gas gap. The calculations are performed in air, at atmospheric pressure. The discharge is powered by a pulse with a voltage amplitude of -20 kV. When comparing the packed and unpacked DBD reactors with the same dielectric barriers, it is clear that the presence of the dielectric packing leads to a transition in discharge behavior from a combination of negative streamers and unlimited surface streamers on the bottom dielectric surface to a combination of predominant positive streamers and limited surface discharges on the dielectric surfaces of the beads and plates. Furthermore, in the packed bed DBD, the electric field is locally enhanced inside the dielectric material, near the contact points between the beads and the plates, and therefore also in the plasma between the packing beads and between a bead and the dielectric wall, leading to values of V m-1, which is much higher than the electric field in the empty DBD reactor, i.e., in the order of V m-1, thus resulting in stronger and faster development of the plasma, and also in a higher electron density. The locally enhanced electric field and the electron density in the case of a packed bed DBD are also examined and discussed for three different dielectric constants, i.e., (ZrO2), (Al2O3) and (SiO2). The enhanced electric field is stronger and the electron density is higher for a larger dielectric constant, because the dielectric material is more effectively polarized. These simulations are very important, because of the increasing interest in packed bed DBDs for environmental applications.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/18665
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/17684
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher[London] : IOP
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/083056
dc.relation.essn1367-2630
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
dc.subject.ddc530
dc.subject.otheratmospheric pressure dischargeeng
dc.subject.otherdielectric-barrier dischargeeng
dc.subject.otherpacked bed dielectric-barrier dischargeeng
dc.subject.otherparticle-in-celleng
dc.subject.otherstreamereng
dc.titleTwo-dimensional particle-in cell/Monte Carlo simulations of a packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressureeng
dc.typeArticle
dc.typeText
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorINP
wgl.subjectPhysikger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zhang_2015_New_J_Phys_17_083056.pdf
Size:
2.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections