Impact of droughts on the carbon cycle in European vegetation: A probabilistic risk analysis using six vegetation models

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage6357eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue22eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage6375eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorVan Oijen, M.
dc.contributor.authorBalkovi, J.
dc.contributor.authorBeer, C.
dc.contributor.authorCameron, D.R.
dc.contributor.authorCiais, P.
dc.contributor.authorCramer, W.
dc.contributor.authorKato, T.
dc.contributor.authorKuhnert, M.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, R.
dc.contributor.authorMyneni, R.
dc.contributor.authorRammig, A.
dc.contributor.authorRolinski, S.
dc.contributor.authorSoussana, J.-F.
dc.contributor.authorThonicke, K.
dc.contributor.authorVan der Velde, M.
dc.contributor.authorXu, L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T21:39:07Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:18:18Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractWe analyse how climate change may alter risks posed by droughts to carbon fluxes in European ecosystems. The approach follows a recently proposed framework for risk analysis based on probability theory. In this approach, risk is quantified as the product of hazard probability and ecosystem vulnerability. The probability of a drought hazard is calculated here from the Standardized Precipitation–Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). Vulnerability is calculated from the response to drought simulated by process-based vegetation models. We use six different models: three for generic vegetation (JSBACH, LPJmL, ORCHIDEE) and three for specific ecosystems (Scots pine forests: BASFOR; winter wheat fields: EPIC; grasslands: PASIM). The periods 1971–2000 and 2071–2100 are compared. Climate data are based on gridded observations and on output from the regional climate model REMO using the SRES A1B scenario. The risk analysis is carried out for ~ 18 000 grid cells of 0.25 × 0.25° across Europe. For each grid cell, drought vulnerability and risk are quantified for five seasonal variables: net primary and ecosystem productivity (NPP, NEP), heterotrophic respiration (Rh), soil water content and evapotranspiration. In this analysis, climate change leads to increased drought risks for net primary productivity in the Mediterranean area: five of the models estimate that risk will exceed 15%. The risks increase mainly because of greater drought probability; ecosystem vulnerability will increase to a lesser extent. Because NPP will be affected more than Rh, future carbon sequestration (NEP) will also be at risk predominantly in southern Europe, with risks exceeding 0.25 g C m−2 d−1 according to most models, amounting to reductions in carbon sequestration of 20 to 80%.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1022
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/547
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMünchen : European Geopyhsical Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6357-2014
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiogeosciences, Volume 11, Issue 22, Page 6357-6375eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectcarbon cycleeng
dc.subjectcarbon fluxeng
dc.subjectcarbon sequestrationeng
dc.subjectclimate changeeng
dc.subjectdroughteng
dc.subjectdrought stresseng
dc.subjectnet ecosystem productioneng
dc.subjectprobabilityrisk assessmenteng
dc.subjectvegetation covereng
dc.subjectvulnerabilityeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleImpact of droughts on the carbon cycle in European vegetation: A probabilistic risk analysis using six vegetation modelseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleBiogeoscienceseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bg-11-6357-2014.pdf
Size:
2.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: