Systematic evaluation of scenario assessments supporting sustainable integrated natural resources management: Evidence from four case studies in Africa

dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEcology and Societyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume23
dc.contributor.authorReinhardt, Julia
dc.contributor.authorLiersch, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorAbdeladhim, Mohamed Arbi
dc.contributor.authorDiallo, Mori
dc.contributor.authorDickens, Chris
dc.contributor.authorFournet, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorHattermann, Fred Fokko
dc.contributor.authorKabaseke, Clovis
dc.contributor.authorMuhumuza, Moses
dc.contributor.authorMul, Marloes L.
dc.contributor.authorPilz, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorOtto, lona M.
dc.contributor.authorWalz, Ariane
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-13T02:38:27Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractScenarios have become a key tool for supporting sustainability research on regional and global change. In this study we evaluate four regional scenario assessments: first, to explore a number of research challenges related to sustainability science and, second, to contribute to sustainability research in the specific case studies. The four case studies used commonly applied scenario approaches that are (i) a story and simulation approach with stakeholder participation in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia, (ii) a participatory scenario exploration in the Rwenzori region, Uganda, (iii) a model-based prepolicy study in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali, and (iv) a model coupling-based scenario analysis in upper Thukela basin, South Africa. The scenario assessments are evaluated against a set of known challenges in sustainability science, with each challenge represented by two indicators, complemented by a survey carried out on the perception of the scenario assessments within the case study regions. The results show that all types of scenario assessments address many sustainability challenges, but that the more complex ones based on story and simulation and model coupling are the most comprehensive. The study highlights the need to investigate abrupt system changes as well as governmental and political factors as important sources of uncertainty. For an in-depth analysis of these issues, the use of qualitative approaches and an active engagement of local stakeholders are suggested. Studying ecological thresholds for the regional scale is recommended to support research on regional sustainability. The evaluation of the scenario processes and outcomes by local researchers indicates the most transparent scenario assessments as the most useful. Focused, straightforward, yet iterative scenario assessments can be very relevant by contributing information to selected sustainability problems.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1324
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/876
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWolfville : The Resilience Allianceeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09728-230105
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.otherAfricaeng
dc.subject.otherglobal and regional changeeng
dc.subject.otherintegrated assessmentseng
dc.subject.otherparticipatory researcheng
dc.subject.othersustainability scienceeng
dc.titleSystematic evaluation of scenario assessments supporting sustainable integrated natural resources management: Evidence from four case studies in Africaeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files