Technical Note: Intercomparison of formaldehyde measurements at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage2189eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue8eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage2200eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume8
dc.contributor.authorWisthaler, A.
dc.contributor.authorApel, E.C.
dc.contributor.authorBossmeyer, J.
dc.contributor.authorHansel, A.
dc.contributor.authorJunkermann, W.
dc.contributor.authorKoppmann, R.
dc.contributor.authorMeier, R.
dc.contributor.authorMüller, K.
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorSteinbrecher, R.
dc.contributor.authorTillmann, R.
dc.contributor.authorBrauers, T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-28T12:44:00Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:17:14Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThe atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR at the Research Centre Jülich was used to test the suitability of state-of-the-art analytical instruments for the measurement of gas-phase formaldehyde (HCHO) in air. Five analyzers based on four different sensing principles were deployed: a differential optical absorption spectrometer (DOAS), cartridges for 2,4-dinitro\-phenyl\-hydrazine (DNPH) derivatization followed by off-line high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, two different types of commercially available wet chemical sensors based on Hantzsch fluorimetry, and a proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS). A new optimized mode of operation was used for the PTR-MS instrument which significantly enhanced its performance for online HCHO detection at low absolute humidities. The instruments were challenged with typical ambient levels of HCHO ranging from zero to several ppb. Synthetic air of high purity and particulate-filtered ambient air were used as sample matrices in the atmosphere simulation chamber onto which HCHO was spiked under varying levels of humidity and ozone. Measurements were compared to mixing ratios calculated from the chamber volume and the known amount of HCHO injected into the chamber; measurements were also compared between the different instruments. The formal and blind intercomparison exercise was conducted under the control of an independent referee. A number of analytical problems associated with the experimental set-up and with individual instruments were identified, the overall agreement between the methods was fair.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1323
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/333
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMünchen : European Geopyhsical Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2189-2008
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Volume 8, Issue 8, Page 2189-2200eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleTechnical Note: Intercomparison of formaldehyde measurements at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIReng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acp-8-2189-2008.pdf
Size:
643.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: