Electric resistivity and seismic refraction tomography: a challenging joint underwater survey at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage671eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleSolid earth : SEeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage682eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume8eng
dc.contributor.authorRonczka, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorHellman, Kristofer
dc.contributor.authorGünther, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorWisén, Roger
dc.contributor.authorDahlin, Torleif
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T08:37:47Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T08:37:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractTunnelling below water passages is a challenging task in terms of planning, pre-investigation and construction. Fracture zones in the underlying bedrock lead to low rock quality and thus reduced stability. For natural reasons, they tend to be more frequent at water passages. Ground investigations that provide information on the subsurface are necessary prior to the construction phase, but these can be logistically difficult. Geophysics can help close the gaps between local point information by producing subsurface images. An approach that combines seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography has been tested at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (HRL). The aim was to detect fracture zones in a well-known but logistically challenging area from a measuring perspective. The presented surveys cover a water passage along part of a tunnel that connects surface facilities with an underground test laboratory. The tunnel is approximately 100 m below and 20 m east of the survey line and gives evidence for one major and several minor fracture zones. The geological and general test site conditions, e.g. with strong power line noise from the nearby nuclear power plant, are challenging for geophysical measurements. Co-located positions for seismic and ERT sensors and source positions are used on the 450 m underwater section of the 700 m profile. Because of a large transition zone that appeared in the ERT result and the missing coverage of the seismic data, fracture zones at the southern and northern parts of the underwater passage cannot be detected by separated inversion. Synthetic studies show that significant three-dimensional (3-D) artefacts occur in the ERT model that even exceed the positioning errors of underwater electrodes. The model coverage is closely connected to the resolution and can be used to display the model uncertainty by introducing thresholds to fade-out regions of medium and low resolution. A structural coupling cooperative inversion approach is able to image the northern fracture zone successfully. In addition, previously unknown sedimentary deposits with a significantly large thickness are detected in the otherwise unusually well-documented geological environment. The results significantly improve the imaging of some geologic features, which would have been undetected or misinterpreted otherwise, and combines the images by means of cluster analysis into a conceptual subsurface model.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8743
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7781
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherGöttingen : Copernicus Publ.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-671-2017
dc.relation.essn1869-9529
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.otherCluster analysiseng
dc.subject.otherElectric conductivityeng
dc.subject.otherFractureeng
dc.subject.otherGeologyeng
dc.subject.otherGeophysicseng
dc.subject.otherNuclear fuelseng
dc.subject.otherNuclear power plantseng
dc.subject.otherRefractioneng
dc.subject.otherSurveyseng
dc.subject.otherUncertainty analysiseng
dc.subject.otherElectrical resistivity tomographyeng
dc.subject.otherGeological environmenteng
dc.subject.otherGeophysical measurementseng
dc.subject.otherGround investigationeng
dc.subject.otherSedimentary depositseng
dc.subject.otherSeismic refraction tomographyeng
dc.subject.otherStructural couplingeng
dc.subject.otherThreedimensional (3-d)eng
dc.subject.otherSeismologyeng
dc.subject.otherbedrockeng
dc.subject.othercluster analysiseng
dc.subject.otherelectrical resistivityeng
dc.subject.otherfracture zoneeng
dc.subject.othergeophysical surveyeng
dc.subject.otherhard rockeng
dc.subject.otherlaboratory methodeng
dc.subject.otherseismic dataeng
dc.subject.otherseismic refractioneng
dc.subject.otherseismic tomographyeng
dc.subject.othertunnelingeng
dc.subject.otherunderwater environmenteng
dc.titleElectric resistivity and seismic refraction tomography: a challenging joint underwater survey at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratoryeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorLIAGeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Electric_resistivity_and_seismic_refraction_tomography.pdf
Size:
3.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: