FLIM data analysis based on Laguerre polynomial decomposition and machine-learning

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage022909eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of biomedical opticseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume26eng
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Shuxia
dc.contributor.authorSilge, Anja
dc.contributor.authorBae, Hyeonsoo
dc.contributor.authorTolstik, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMatziolis, Georg
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorBocklitz, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T08:09:41Z
dc.date.available2022-03-07T08:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractSignificance: The potential of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is recently being recognized, especially in biological studies. However, FLIM does not directly measure the lifetimes, rather it records the fluorescence decay traces. The lifetimes and/or abundances have to be estimated from these traces during the phase of data processing. To precisely estimate these parameters is challenging and requires a well-designed computer program. Conventionally employed methods, which are based on curve fitting, are computationally expensive and limited in performance especially for highly noisy FLIM data. The graphical analysis, while free of fit, requires calibration samples for a quantitative analysis. Aim: We propose to extract the lifetimes and abundances directly from the decay traces through machine learning (ML). Approach: The ML-based approach was verified with simulated testing data in which the lifetimes and abundances were known exactly. Thereafter, we compared its performance with the commercial software SPCImage based on datasets measured from biological samples on a time-correlated single photon counting system. We reconstructed the decay traces using the lifetime and abundance values estimated by ML and SPCImage methods and utilized the root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) as marker. Results: The RMSE, which represents the difference between the reconstructed and measured decay traces, was observed to be lower for ML than for SPCImage. In addition, we could demonstrate with a three-component analysis the high potential and flexibility of the ML method to deal with more than two lifetime components.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8179
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7218
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBellingham, Wash. : SPIEeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.022909
dc.relation.essn1560-2281
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc530eng
dc.subject.ddc610eng
dc.subject.othermachine learningeng
dc.subject.otherfluorescence lifetime imaging microscopyeng
dc.subject.otherlife time extractioneng
dc.subject.otherchemometricseng
dc.subject.otherfit-freeeng
dc.titleFLIM data analysis based on Laguerre polynomial decomposition and machine-learningeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIPHTeng
wgl.subjectPhysikeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FLIM_data_analysis_based_on_laguerre.pdf
Size:
3.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections