The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee271
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleThe Lancet Planetary Healtheng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPagee279
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume4
dc.contributor.authorLenzen, Manfred
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Arunima
dc.contributor.authorLi, Mengyu
dc.contributor.authorFry, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorWeisz, Helga
dc.contributor.authorPichler, Peter-Paul
dc.contributor.authorChaves, Leonardo Suveges Moreira
dc.contributor.authorCapon, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorPencheon, David
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T07:11:18Z
dc.date.available2022-12-09T07:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Health-care services are necessary for sustaining and improving human wellbeing, yet they have an environmental footprint that contributes to environment-related threats to human health. Previous studies have quantified the carbon emissions resulting from health care at a global level. We aimed to provide a global assessment of the wide-ranging environmental impacts of this sector. Methods: In this multiregional input-output analysis, we evaluated the contribution of health-care sectors in driving environmental damage that in turn puts human health at risk. Using a global supply-chain database containing detailed information on health-care sectors, we quantified the direct and indirect supply-chain environmental damage driven by the demand for health care. We focused on seven environmental stressors with known adverse feedback cycles: greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter, air pollutants (nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide), malaria risk, reactive nitrogen in water, and scarce water use. Findings: Health care causes global environmental impacts that, depending on which indicator is considered, range between 1% and 5% of total global impacts, and are more than 5% for some national impacts. Interpretation: Enhancing health-care expenditure to mitigate negative health effects of environmental damage is often promoted by health-care practitioners. However, global supply chains that feed into the enhanced activity of health-care sectors in turn initiate adverse feedback cycles by increasing the environmental impact of health care, thus counteracting the mission of health care. Funding: Australian Research Council, National eResearch Collaboration Tools and Resources project. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseeng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10562
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9598
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elsevier
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30121-2
dc.relation.essn2542-5196
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Exposureeng
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Pollutantseng
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Pollutioneng
dc.subject.otherGlobal Healtheng
dc.subject.otherHealth Care Sectoreng
dc.subject.otherHumanseng
dc.subject.otherMalariaeng
dc.subject.otherRiskeng
dc.subject.otherWater Supplyeng
dc.titleThe environmental footprint of health care: a global assessmenteng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheitger
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s20-S2542519620301212-main.pdf
Size:
1.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: