Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets

dc.bibliographicCitation.date2015
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage192
dc.bibliographicCitation.issueA
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleTechnological forecasting and social change : an international journaleng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage203
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume90
dc.contributor.authorArroyo-Currás, Tabaré
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Nico
dc.contributor.authorKriegler, Elmar
dc.contributor.authorSchwanitz, Valeria Jana
dc.contributor.authorLuderer, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorAboumahboub, Tino
dc.contributor.authorGiannousakis, Anastasis
dc.contributor.authorHilaire, Jérôme
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractAs a global climate agreement has not yet been achieved, a variety of national climate policy agendas are being pursued in different parts of the world. Regionally fragmented climate policy regimes are prone to carbon leakage between regions, which has given rise to concerns about the environmental effectiveness of this approach. This study investigates carbon leakage through energy markets and the resulting macro-economic effects by exploring the sensitivity of leakage to the size and composition of pioneering regions that adopt ambitious climate action early on. The study uses the multi-regional energy–economy–climate model REMIND 1.5 to analyze the implications of Europe, China and the United States taking unilateral or joint early action. We find that carbon leakage is the combined effect of fossil fuel and capital market re-allocation. Leakage is limited to 15% of the emission reductions in the pioneering regions, and depends on the size and composition of the pioneering coalition and the decarbonization strategy in the energy sector. There is an incentive to delay action to avoid near-term costs, but the immediate GDP losses after acceding to a global climate regime can be higher in the case of delayed action compared to early action. We conclude that carbon leakage is not a strong counter-argument against early action by pioneers to induce other regions to adopt more stringent mitigation.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9785
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/8823
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.002
dc.relation.essn0040-1625
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc600
dc.subject.otherCarbon leakageeng
dc.subject.otherClimate policyeng
dc.subject.otherCopenhagen pledgeseng
dc.subject.otherFossil energy marketseng
dc.titleCarbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy marketseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKger
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Carbon_leakage_in_a_fragmented_climate_regime.pdf
Size:
514.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: