Can gadolinium compete with La-Fe-Co-Si in a thermomagnetic generator?

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage643eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleScience and technology of advanced materialseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage657eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume22eng
dc.contributor.authorDzekan, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDiestel, Anett
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorNielsch, Kornelius
dc.contributor.authorFähler, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T12:57:10Z
dc.date.available2022-01-10T12:57:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractA thermomagnetic generator is a promising technology to harvest low-grade waste heat and convert it into electricity. To make this technology competitive with other technologies for energy harvesting near room temperature, the optimum thermomagnetic material is required. Here we compare the performance of a state of the art thermomagnetic generator using gadolinium and La-Fe-Co-Si as thermomagnetic material, which exhibit strong differences in thermal conductivity and type of magnetic transition. gadolinium is the established benchmark material for magnetocaloric cooling, which follows the reverse energy conversion process as compared to thermomagnetic energy harvesting. Surprisingly, La-Fe-Co-Si outperforms gadolinium in terms of voltage and power output. Our analysis reveals the differences in thermal conductivity are less important than the particular shape of the magnetization curve. In gadolinium an unsymmetrical magnetization curve is responsible for an uncompensated magnetic flux, which results in magnetic stray fields. These stray fields represent an energy barrier in the thermodynamic cycle and reduce the output of the generator. Our detailed experiments and simulations of both, thermomagnetic materials and generator, clearly reveal the importance to minimize magnetic stray fields. This is only possible when using materials with a symmetrical magnetization curve, such as La-Fe-Co-Si.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7804
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6845
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAbingdon : Taylor & Franciseng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1957657
dc.relation.essn1878-5514
dc.relation.issn1468-6996
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc690eng
dc.subject.otherMetallic materialseng
dc.subject.otherMagnetics/Spintronics/Superconductorseng
dc.subject.otherEnergy conversion/transport/storage/recoveryeng
dc.subject.otherEnergy Materialseng
dc.subject.otherEnergy harvestingeng
dc.subject.othermagnetocaloric materialseng
dc.subject.otherthermomagnetic generatoreng
dc.subject.otherthermomagnetic materialseng
dc.subject.otherwaste heat recoveryeng
dc.titleCan gadolinium compete with La-Fe-Co-Si in a thermomagnetic generator?eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIFWDeng
wgl.subjectChemieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
14686996.2021.pdf
Size:
3.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections