Supervised Machine Learning to Assess Methane Emissions of a Dairy Building with Natural Ventilation

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage6938eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue19eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleApplied Scienceseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10eng
dc.contributor.authorHempel, Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorAdolphs, Julian
dc.contributor.authorLandwehr, Niels
dc.contributor.authorWillink, Dilya
dc.contributor.authorJanke, David
dc.contributor.authorAmon, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T09:41:47Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T09:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractA reliable quantification of greenhouse gas emissions is a basis for the development of adequate mitigation measures. Protocols for emission measurements and data analysis approaches to extrapolate to accurate annual emission values are a substantial prerequisite in this context. We systematically analyzed the benefit of supervised machine learning methods to project methane emissions from a naturally ventilated cattle building with a concrete solid floor and manure scraper located in Northern Germany. We took into account approximately 40 weeks of hourly emission measurements and compared model predictions using eight regression approaches, 27 different sampling scenarios and four measures of model accuracy. Data normalization was applied based on median and quartile range. A correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of individual features. This indicated only a very weak linear relation between the methane emission and features that are typically used to predict methane emission values of naturally ventilated barns. It further highlighted the added value of including day-time and squared ambient temperature as features. The error of the predicted emission values was in general below 10%. The results from Gaussian processes, ordinary multilinear regression and neural networks were least robust. More robust results were obtained with multilinear regression with regularization, support vector machines and particularly the ensemble methods gradient boosting and random forest. The latter had the added value to be rather insensitive against the normalization procedure. In the case of multilinear regression, also the removal of not significantly linearly related variables (i.e., keeping only the day-time component) led to robust modeling results. We concluded that measurement protocols with 7 days and six measurement periods can be considered sufficient to model methane emissions from the dairy barn with solid floor with manure scraper, particularly when periods are distributed over the year with a preference for transition periods. Features should be normalized according to median and quartile range and must be carefully selected depending on the modeling approach.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6344
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5391
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : MDPIeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10196938
dc.relation.essn2076-3417
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc600eng
dc.subject.otherEmission factoreng
dc.subject.otherEnsemble methodseng
dc.subject.otherGradient boostingeng
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse gaseng
dc.subject.otherNeural networkseng
dc.subject.otherOn-farm evaluationeng
dc.subject.otherRandom foresteng
dc.subject.otherRegressioneng
dc.subject.otherSupport vector machineseng
dc.titleSupervised Machine Learning to Assess Methane Emissions of a Dairy Building with Natural Ventilationeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBeng
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supervised Machine Learning to Assess Methane Emissions of a Dairy Building with Natural Ventilation.pdf
Size:
2.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: