DNA and RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR-based assays for biogas biocenoses in an interlaboratory comparison

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage7
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume3
dc.contributor.authorLebuhn, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDerenkó, Jaqueline
dc.contributor.authorRademacher, Antje
dc.contributor.authorHelbig, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorMunk, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorPechtl, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorStolze, Yvonne
dc.contributor.authorProwe, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Wolfgang H.
dc.contributor.authorSchlüter, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorLiebl, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorKlocke, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T08:16:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractFive institutional partners participated in an interlaboratory comparison of nucleic acid extraction, RNA preservation and quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) based assays for biogas biocenoses derived from different grass silage digesting laboratory and pilot scale fermenters. A kit format DNA extraction system based on physical and chemical lysis with excellent extraction efficiency yielded highly reproducible results among the partners and clearly outperformed a traditional CTAB/chloroform/isoamylalcohol based method. Analytical purpose, sample texture, consistency and upstream pretreatment steps determine the modifications that should be applied to achieve maximum efficiency in the trade-off between extract purity and nucleic acid recovery rate. RNA extraction was much more variable, and the destination of the extract determines the method to be used. RNA stabilization with quaternary ammonium salts was an as satisfactory approach as flash freezing in liquid N2. Due to co-eluted impurities, spectrophotometry proved to be of limited value for nucleic acid qualification and quantification in extracts obtained with the kit, and picoGreen® based quantification was more trustworthy. Absorbance at 230 nm can be extremely high in the presence of certain chaotropic guanidine salts, but guanidinium isothiocyanate does not affect (q)PCR. Absolute quantification by qPCR requires application of a reliable internal standard for which correct PCR efficiency and Y-intercept values are important and must be reported.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9787
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/8825
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : MDPI
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3010007
dc.relation.essn2306-5354
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBioengineering : open access journal 3 (2016), Nr. 1
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAbsolute quantificationeng
dc.subjectBacteriaeng
dc.subjectDNA purityeng
dc.subjectExtraction efficiencyeng
dc.subjectFermenter sludgeeng
dc.subjectMethanogenseng
dc.subjectPCR suitabilityeng
dc.subjectReverse transcriptioneng
dc.subjectRing-trialeng
dc.subjectRNA preservationeng
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleDNA and RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR-based assays for biogas biocenoses in an interlaboratory comparisoneng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleBioengineering : open access journal
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBger
wgl.subjectBiowissenschaften/Biologieger
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DNA_and_RNA_extraction.pdf
Size:
2.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: