Microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of particulate reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study between SiC particles and high-entropy alloy particles

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage13646eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage13660eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9eng
dc.contributor.authorLu, Tiwen
dc.contributor.authorHe, Tianbing
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zixuan
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hongyu
dc.contributor.authorHan, Xiaoliang
dc.contributor.authorFu, Zhiqiang
dc.contributor.authorChen, Weiping
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T10:32:48Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T10:32:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn this study, 2024Al matrix composites reinforced by SiC particles (SiC-2024Al) and nanocrystalline high-entropy alloy particles (HEA-2024Al) fabricated by powder metallurgy were systematically compared for the first time. There is a significant difference in microstructure and mechanical properties as well as machinability between two kinds of composites. In term of microstructure, when the volume fraction of reinforcements was 10%, both SiC-2024Al and HEA-2024Al composites showed a homogeneous particle distribution in the matrix. With the increase of reinforcement content, HEA-2024Al composites presented denser microstructure than that of SiC-2024Al composites. The composites with 10, 20 and 30 vol.% HEA reinforcements all showed better plasticity than that of the SiC-2024Al composites with same volume fraction of reinforcements, which was related with better particle distribution and interface bonding. However, the strength showed the opposite tendency in the two kinds of composites. Selecting 10SiC-2024Al and 10HEA-2024Al composites as examples to explore the difference in the yield strength of two kinds of composites, it is ascribed to the dislocation punched zones around interface between the Al matrix and reinforcements, which was analyzed in detail by a combination of calculation, nanoindentation tests and finite element analysis. Additionally, HEA-2024Al composites showed better machinability than those of SiC-2024Al composites. This work provides insight into the application of particulate reinforced Al matrix composites.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/4698
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6069
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.034
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Materials Research and Technology 9 (2020), Nr. 6eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectAl matrix compositeseng
dc.subjectSiC particleeng
dc.subjectHigh-entropy alloy particleeng
dc.subjectMicrostructureeng
dc.subjectMechanical propertieseng
dc.subjectMachinabilityeng
dc.subject.ddc620eng
dc.titleMicrostructure, mechanical properties and machinability of particulate reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study between SiC particles and high-entropy alloy particleseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of Materials Research and Technologyeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIFWDeng
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lu2020.pdf
Size:
7.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: