Bio-IGCC with CCS as a long-term mitigation option in a coupled energy-system and land-use model

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage2933eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage2940eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume4eng
dc.contributor.authorKlein, D.
dc.contributor.authorBauer, N.
dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, B.
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorPopp, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-25T12:04:53Z
dc.date.available2020-09-25T12:04:53Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThis study analyses the impact of techno-economic performance of the BIGCC process and the effect of different biomass feedstocks on the technology's long term deployment in climate change mitigation scenarios. As the BIGCC technology demands high amounts of biomass raw material it also affects the land-use sector and is dependent on conditions and constraints on the land-use side. To represent the interaction of biomass demand and supply side the global energy-economy-climate model ReMIND is linked to the global land-use model MAgPIE. The link integrates biomass demand and price as well as emission prices and land-use emissions. Results indicate that BIGCC with CCS could serve as an important mitigation option and that it could even be the main bioenergy conversion technology sharing 33% of overall mitigation in 2100. The contribution of BIGCC technology to long-term climate change mitigation is much higher if grass is used as fuel instead of wood, provided that the grass-based process is highly efficient. The capture rate has to significantly exceed 60 % otherwise the technology is not applied. The overall primary energy consumption of biomass reacts much more sensitive to price changes of the biomass than to technoeconomic performance of the BIGCC process. As biomass is mainly used with CCS technologies high amounts of carbon are captured ranging from 130 GtC to 240 GtC (cumulated from 2005-2100) in different scenarios.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/4318
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/5689
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.201
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergy Procedia 4 (2011)eng
dc.relation.issn1876-6102
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/eng
dc.subjectBiomasseng
dc.subjectCarbon capture and sequestrationeng
dc.subjectIGCCeng
dc.subjectLand useeng
dc.subjectSoft linkeng
dc.subjectCarbon captureeng
dc.subjectClimate changeeng
dc.subjectClimate modelseng
dc.subjectCostseng
dc.subjectEconomic and social effectseng
dc.subjectEconomicseng
dc.subjectEnergy utilizationeng
dc.subjectGreenhouse gaseseng
dc.subjectLand useeng
dc.subjectBio-energy conversion technologyeng
dc.subjectCarbon capture and sequestrationseng
dc.subjectClimate change mitigationeng
dc.subjectIGCCeng
dc.subjectMitigation optionseng
dc.subjectPrimary energy consumptioneng
dc.subjectSoft linkeng
dc.subjectTechnoeconomic performanceeng
dc.subjectBiomasseng
dc.subject.ddc620eng
dc.titleBio-IGCC with CCS as a long-term mitigation option in a coupled energy-system and land-use modeleng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnergy Procediaeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectIngenieurwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Klein2011.pdf
Size:
302.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: