Mesospheric semidiurnal tides and near-12 h waves through jointly analyzing observations of five specular meteor radars from three longitudinal sectors at boreal midlatitudes

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage5993eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue9eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric chemistry and physicseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage6006eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume19eng
dc.contributor.authorHe, Maosheng
dc.contributor.authorLuis Chau, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T09:43:57Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T09:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn the last decades, mesospheric tides have been intensively investigated with observations from both ground-based radars and satellites. Single-site radar observations provide continuous measurements at fixed locations without horizontal information, whereas single-spacecraft missions typically provide global coverage with limited temporal coverage at a given location. In this work, by combining 8 years (2009–2016) of mesospheric winds collected by five specular meteor radars from three different longitudinal sectors at boreal midlatitudes (49±8.5∘ N), we develop an approach to investigate the most intense global-scale oscillation, namely at the period T=12±0.5 h. Six waves are resolved: the semidiurnal westward-traveling tidal modes with zonal wave numbers 1, 2, and 3 (SW1, SW2, SW3), the lunar semidiurnal tide M2, and the upper and lower sidebands (USB and LSB) of the 16 d wave nonlinear modulation on SW2. The temporal variations of the waves are studied statistically with a special focus on their responses to sudden stratospheric warming events (SSWs) and on their climatological seasonal variations. In response to SSWs, USB, LSB, and M2 enhance, while SW2 decreases. However, SW1 and SW3 do not respond noticeably to SSWs, contrary to the broadly reported enhancements in the literature. The USB, LSB, and SW2 responses could be explained in terms of energy exchange through the nonlinear modulation, while LSB and USB might previously have been misinterpreted as SW1 and SW3, respectively. Besides, we find that LSB and M2 enhancements depend on the SSW classification with respect to the associated split or displacement of the polar vortex. In the case of seasonal variations, our results are qualitatively consistent with previous studies and show a moderate correlation with an empirical tidal model derived from satellite observations.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6525
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5572
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : EGUeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5993-2019
dc.relation.essn1680-7324
dc.relation.issn1680-7316
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.othermesospheric tideseng
dc.subject.otherradar observationeng
dc.subject.othermesospheric windseng
dc.subject.otherstratospheric warming events (SSWs)eng
dc.titleMesospheric semidiurnal tides and near-12 h waves through jointly analyzing observations of five specular meteor radars from three longitudinal sectors at boreal midlatitudeseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIAPeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mesospheric semidiurnal tides and near-12 h waves through jointlyanalyzing observations of five specular meteor radars from threelongitudinal sectors at boreal midlatitudes.pdf
Size:
5.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: