Properties of gaseous closo-[B6X6]2− dianions (X = Cl, Br, I)

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage17713eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue31eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePhysical chemistry, chemical physics : PCCPeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage17724eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume22eng
dc.contributor.authorRohdenburg, Markus
dc.contributor.authorYang, Zheng
dc.contributor.authorSu, Pei
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Qinqin
dc.contributor.authorApra, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorGrabowsky, Simon
dc.contributor.authorLaskin, Julia
dc.contributor.authorJenne, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xue-Bin
dc.contributor.authorWarneke, Jonas
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-03T08:12:15Z
dc.date.available2021-12-03T08:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractElectronic structure, collision-induced dissociation (CID) and bond properties of closo-[B6X6]2− (X = Cl–I) are investigated in direct comparison with their closo-[B12X12]2− analogues. Photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) and theoretical investigations reveal that [B6X6]2− dianions are electronically significantly less stable than the corresponding [B12X12]2− species. Although [B6Cl6]2− is slightly electronically unstable, [B6Br6]2− and [B6I6]2− are intrinsically stable dianions. Consistent with the trend in the electron detachment energy, loss of an electron (e− loss) is observed in CID of [B6X6]2− (X = Cl, Br) but not for [B6I6]2−. Halogenide loss (X− loss) is common for [B6X6]2− (X = Br, I) and [B12X12]2− (X = Cl, Br, I). Meanwhile, X˙ loss is only observed for [B12X12]2− (X = Br, I) species. The calculated reaction enthalpies of the three competing dissociation pathways (e−, X− and X˙ loss) indicated a strong influence of kinetic factors on the observed fragmentation patterns. The repulsive Coulomb barrier (RCB) determines the transition state for the e− and X− losses. A significantly lower RCB for X− loss than for e− loss was found in both experimental and theoretical investigations and can be rationalized by the recently introduced concept of electrophilic anions. The positive reaction enthalpies for X− losses are significantly lower for [B6X6]2− than for [B12X12]2−, while enthalpies for X˙ losses are higher. These observations are consistent with a difference in bond character of the B–X bonds in [B6X6]2− and [B12X12]2−. A complementary bonding analysis using QTAIM, NPA and ELI-D based methods suggests that B–X bonds in [B12X12]2− have a stronger covalent character than in [B6X6]2−, in which X has a stronger halide character.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7614
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6661
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCambridge : RSC Publ.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp02581j
dc.relation.essn1463-9084
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc540eng
dc.subject.othercollision-induced dissociation (CID)eng
dc.subject.otherelectron detachment energyeng
dc.subject.otherrepulsive Coulomb barrier (RCB)eng
dc.titleProperties of gaseous closo-[B6X6]2− dianions (X = Cl, Br, I)eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIOMeng
wgl.subjectPhysikeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Properties of gaseous closo-[B6X6]2− dianions (X = Cl, Br, I).pdf
Size:
2.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections