When Ultimate Adhesive Mechanism Meets Ultimate Anti-Fouling Surfaces—Polydopamine Versus SLIPS: Which One Prevails?

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage2000876eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue18eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAdvanced Materials Interfaceseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume7eng
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-López, Lizbeth Ofelia
dc.contributor.authorHerbeck-Engel, Petra
dc.contributor.authorYang, Li
dc.contributor.authorWu, Qian
dc.contributor.authorLi, Juntang
dc.contributor.authorCui, Jiaxi
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T09:18:46Z
dc.date.available2021-09-01T09:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractWhat happens when the extremely adhesive and versatile chemistry of polydopamine (PDA) is in contact with the extremely slippery surfaces known as slippery liquid-infused porous substrates (SLIPS)? Inspired by the pitcher plant, SLIPS possess excellent repellence against a variety of complex liquids and have been proposed as promising antifouling surfaces because of their successful performance even in marine environments. In the counterpart, inspired by the adhesive proteins enabling the strong adhesion of mussels to multiple substrates, PDA has been extensively studied for its ability to adhere on nearly every type of substrate. The interaction between various SLIPS systems and the highly fouling medium from the oxidative polymerization of dopamine is explored here. A PDA coating is observed on all the SLIPS evaluated, modifying their hydrophobicity in most cases. In-depth study of silicone-based SLIPS shows that hydrophobicity of PDA coated SLIPS partially recovers with time due to percolation of the lubricant through the coating. “Strongly” bound PDA species are attributed to the formation of dopamine-polydimethylsiloxane species on the crosslinked matrix, rendering a coating that withstands repeated washing steps in various solvents including water, hexane, and toluene. The results not only satisfy scientific curiosity but also imply a strategy to modify/bond SLIPS. © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH GmbHeng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6647
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5694
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWeinheim : Wiley-VCHeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202000876
dc.relation.essn2196-7350
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc540eng
dc.subject.ddc600eng
dc.subject.otherfouling; penetrationeng
dc.subject.otherpolydimethylsiloxaneeng
dc.subject.otherpolydopamineeng
dc.subject.otherslippery surfaceseng
dc.titleWhen Ultimate Adhesive Mechanism Meets Ultimate Anti-Fouling Surfaces—Polydopamine Versus SLIPS: Which One Prevails?eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINMeng
wgl.subjectChemieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
admi.202000876.pdf
Size:
2.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections