Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee0204916
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue10
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume13
dc.contributor.authorSteuer, Anna
dc.contributor.authorWolff, Christina M.
dc.contributor.authorvon Woedtke, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorWeltmann, Klaus-Dieter
dc.contributor.authorKolb, Juergen F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T09:31:47Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T09:31:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts through reactive species that are generated in the liquid environment. The objective of this study was to determine, if PEFs combined with plasma-treated cell culture medium can mutually reinforce effects on viability of mammalian cells. Experiments were conducted with rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells and their tumorigenic counterpart WB-ras for a direct comparison of non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells from the same origin. Viability after treatments strongly depended on cell type and applied field strength. Notably, tumorigenic WB-ras cells responded more sensitive to the respective treatments than non-tumorigenic WB-F344 cells. More cells were killed when plasma-treated medium was applied first in combination with treatments with 100-μs PEFs. For the reversed treatment order, i.e. application of PEFs first, the combination with 100-ns PEFs resulted in a stimulating effect for non-tumorigenic but not for tumorigenic cells. The results suggest that other mechanisms, besides simple pore formation, contributed to the mutually reinforcing effects of the two methods.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10865
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9891
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSan Francisco, California, US : PLOS
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916
dc.relation.essn1932-6203
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLOS ONE 13 (2018), Nr. 10eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAnimalseng
dc.subjectCell Line, Tumoreng
dc.subjectCell Proliferationeng
dc.subjectCell Survivaleng
dc.subjectCells, Culturedeng
dc.subjectCombined Modality Therapyeng
dc.subjectCulture Mediaeng
dc.subjectElectric Stimulation Therapyeng
dc.subjectElectricityeng
dc.subjectEpithelial Cellseng
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectNeoplasmseng
dc.subjectPlasma Gaseseng
dc.subjectRatseng
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.titleCell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasmaeng
dc.typearticle
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePLOS ONE
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorINP
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheitger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cell-stimulation-versus.pdf
Size:
5.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections