Intercomparison of middle-atmospheric wind in observations and models

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1971
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage1987
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorRüfenacht, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorBaumgarten, Gerd
dc.contributor.authorHildebrand, Jens
dc.contributor.authorSchranz, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorMatthias, Vivien
dc.contributor.authorStober, Gunter
dc.contributor.authorLübken, Franz-Josef
dc.contributor.authorKämpfer, Niklaus
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T13:23:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T13:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-4-6
dc.description.abstractWind profile information throughout the entire upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere (USLM) is important for the understanding of atmospheric dynamics but became available only recently, thanks to developments in remote sensing techniques and modelling approaches. However, as wind measurements from these altitudes are rare, such products have generally not yet been validated with (other) observations. This paper presents the first long-term intercomparison of wind observations in the USLM by co-located microwave radiometer and lidar instruments at Andenes, Norway (69.3∘ N, 16.0∘ E). Good correspondence has been found at all altitudes for both horizontal wind components for nighttime as well as daylight conditions. Biases are mostly within the random errors and do not exceed 5–10 m s−1, which is less than 10 % of the typically encountered wind speeds. Moreover, comparisons of the observations with the major reanalyses and models covering this altitude range are shown, in particular with the recently released ERA5, ECMWF's first reanalysis to cover the whole USLM region. The agreement between models and observations is very good in general, but temporally limited occurrences of pronounced discrepancies (up to 40 m s−1) exist. In the article's Appendix the possibility of obtaining nighttime wind information about the mesopause region by means of microwave radiometry is investigated.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10687
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9723
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1971-2018
dc.relation.essn1867-8548
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAtmospheric measurement techniques : AMT 11 (2018), Nr. 4
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectatmospheric dynamicseng
dc.subjectatmospheric modelingeng
dc.subjectdetection methodeng
dc.subjectlidareng
dc.subjectmesopauseeng
dc.subjectmicrowave radiometereng
dc.subjectobservational methodeng
dc.subjectradiometric methodeng
dc.subjectremote sensingeng
dc.subjectstratosphereeng
dc.subjectwind velocityeng
dc.subjectAndeneseng
dc.subjectAndoyaeng
dc.subjectNorwayeng
dc.subjectVesteraleneng
dc.subject.ddc550
dc.titleIntercomparison of middle-atmospheric wind in observations and modelseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric measurement techniques : AMT
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIAP
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Intercomparison_of_middle-atmospheric_wind.pdf
Size:
2.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: