Uncertainty analysis of vegetation distribution in the northern high latitudes during the 21st century with a dynamic vegetation model

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage593eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage614eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume2
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Yueyang
dc.contributor.authorZhuang, Qianlai
dc.contributor.authorSchaphoff, Sibyll
dc.contributor.authorSitch, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSokolov, Andrei
dc.contributor.authorKicklighter, David
dc.contributor.authorMelillo, Jerry
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T01:44:54Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T17:20:23Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to assess how high‐latitude vegetation may respond under various climate scenarios during the 21st century with a focus on analyzing model parameters induced uncertainty and how this uncertainty compares to the uncertainty induced by various climates. The analysis was based on a set of 10,000 Monte Carlo ensemble Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena (LPJ) simulations for the northern high latitudes (45oN and polewards) for the period 1900–2100. The LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM) was run under contemporary and future climates from four Special Report Emission Scenarios (SRES), A1FI, A2, B1, and B2, based on the Hadley Centre General Circulation Model (GCM), and six climate scenarios, X901M, X902L, X903H, X904M, X905L, and X906H from the Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). In the current dynamic vegetation model, some parameters are more important than others in determining the vegetation distribution. Parameters that control plant carbon uptake and light‐use efficiency have the predominant influence on the vegetation distribution of both woody and herbaceous plant functional types. The relative importance of different parameters varies temporally and spatially and is influenced by climate inputs. In addition to climate, these parameters play an important role in determining the vegetation distribution in the region. The parameter‐based uncertainties contribute most to the total uncertainty. The current warming conditions lead to a complexity of vegetation responses in the region. Temperate trees will be more sensitive to climate variability, compared with boreal forest trees and C3 perennial grasses. This sensitivity would result in a unanimous northward greenness migration due to anomalous warming in the northern high latitudes. Temporally, boreal needleleaved evergreen plants are projected to decline considerably, and a large portion of C3 perennial grass is projected to disappear by the end of the 21st century. In contrast, the area of temperate trees would increase, especially under the most extreme A1FI scenario. As the warming continues, the northward greenness expansion in the Arctic region could continue.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/1368
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/766
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherHoboken, NJ : Wileyeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.85
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcology and Evolution, Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 593-614eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.subjectClimate-induced uncertaintyeng
dc.subjectgreennesseng
dc.subjectmigrationeng
dc.subjectprameter importanceeng
dc.subjectparameter-induced uncertaintyeng
dc.subjectsensitivity analysiseng
dc.subjectvegetation redistributioneng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleUncertainty analysis of vegetation distribution in the northern high latitudes during the 21st century with a dynamic vegetation modeleng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEcology and Evolutioneng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jiang_et_al-2012-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdf
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: