SHMIP The subglacial hydrology model intercomparison Project

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage897
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue248
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage916
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume64
dc.contributor.authorDe Fleurian, Basile
dc.contributor.authorWerder, Mauro A.
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorBrinkenhoff, Douglas J.
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Ian
dc.contributor.authorDow, Christine F.
dc.contributor.authorDowns, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorGagliardini, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorHookeE, Roger LeB
dc.contributor.authorSeguinot, Julien
dc.contributor.authorSommers, Aleah N.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T10:48:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T10:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractSubglacial hydrology plays a key role in many glaciological processes, including ice dynamics via the modulation of basal sliding. Owing to the lack of an overarching theory, however, a variety of model approximations exist to represent the subglacial drainage system. The Subglacial Hydrology Model Intercomparison Project (SHMIP) provides a set of synthetic experiments to compare existing and future models. We present the results from 13 participating models with a focus on effective pressure and discharge. For many applications (e.g. steady states and annual variations, low input scenarios) a simple model, such as an inefficient-system-only model, a flowline or lumped model, or a porous-layer model provides results comparable to those of more complex models. However, when studying short term (e.g. diurnal) variations of the water pressure, the use of a two-dimensional model incorporating physical representations of both efficient and inefficient drainage systems yields results that are significantly different from those of simpler models and should be preferentially applied. The results also emphasise the role of water storage in the response of water pressure to transient recharge. Finally, we find that the localisation of moulins has a limited impact except in regions of sparse moulin density.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10912
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9938
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCambridge : Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.78
dc.relation.essn1727-5652
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Glaciology 64 (2018), Nr. 248eng
dc.relation.issn0022-1430
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectglacier hydrologyeng
dc.subjectglacier modellingeng
dc.subjectglaciological model experimentseng
dc.subjectice-sheet modellingeng
dc.subjectsubglacial processeseng
dc.subject.ddc550
dc.titleSHMIP The subglacial hydrology model intercomparison Projecteng
dc.typearticle
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of Glaciology
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
shmip-the-subglacial-hydrology-model-intercomparison.pdf
Size:
3.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: